this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
577 points (96.8% liked)

Political Memes

9169 readers
2837 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well that's just fucking wrong. I'm not going to give up on the meaning of words just because crazy people have.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What part of that is wrong? It's two people looking at the same thing and seeing different things. You see the term harm reduction and see it as good. They see the term harm reduction and see it as bad because [see my explanation above].

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it's merely harm reduction, not actually good.

Reducing harm is good.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Are you seriously going to ignore what I said? That's basically twice.

I see it it as good. They see it as bad.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"it's merely harm reduction, not actually good."

"Well, that's just fucking wrong. I'm not going to give up on the meaning of words just because crazy people have."

What part of that is wrong?

"it's merely harm reduction, not actually good."

"Reducing harm is good."

I have been responding to exactly what you've said, and you think I'm ignoring what you said? Maybe you took "Well, that's just fucking wrong" as my saying that your claim about what crazy people think was wrong. I could have been clearer about that.

My point stands. I don't care what crazy people who are wrong think. And if some bystander is going to be swayed by an argument that harm reduction is bad, they're crazy, too. There's a lot of fucking crazies, and there's nothing I can do about that.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ok we cleared up the last that you think they are wrong, not that I was wrong.

But you are still basically ignoring this:

It's [the meme of] two people looking at the same thing and seeing different things. You see the term harm reduction and see it as good. They see the term harm reduction and see it as bad because [see my explanation above].

If you use the term harm reduction, they will never see what you want them to see. Never. Because it's this scenario:

collapsed inline media

Except in this case you're both using the same word to mean different things. Call them wrong, and they'll call you wrong, and you'll talk past each other forever.

Orrrrrrr call it incrementalism.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you use the term harm reduction, they will never see what you want them to see.

As before, I don't care what crazy people think. I'm not wasting my time trying to convince unreasonable people to accept reason, and I'm not going to bend to suit what crazy people might accept.

I've spent many years trying to use reason as a tool for progress, and look where we are now. We're well past the point where reason is an effective tool. The crazy people have numbers on their side. Perhaps they always have, and it just hasn't been obvious until the last few years.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sorry but you're still ignoring what I'm saying. Whether you talk to them or not, you're not even speaking the same language (see meme).

Frankly no wonder you're frustrated because you're talking past them, just like you're talking past me.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago

As before, I don't care what crazy people think. I'm not wasting my time trying to convince unreasonable people to accept reason

Who's ignoring whom? I'm not trying to change the minds of crazy people at all. I'm not "talking past them," because I'm not talking to them at all.

Except you, apparently.