this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
949 points (98.1% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

1219 readers
923 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Originally Posted By u/q0_0p At 2025-08-10 08:00:14 PM | Source


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, all of this would be great. There's no chance of it happening, though. We're at a point where either we rise up and take what we want or it'll never change. And we're basically incapable of rising up. Prove me wrong!

[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can't prove you wrong, because you're right.

Also, these are nice goals but a project needs a properly fleshed out plan with Steps on how to achieve those. It'll all be hampered by the fact that judicial is heavily swayed to the right with no term limits and getting that passed will be impossible. It's the lynch point needed to achieve everything else.

[–] HurricaneLiz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The judicial branch siding with the executive branch on nearly everything constitutes a constitutional crisis in my mind even tho the official definition is the executive branch not heeding the judicial branch's decisions. The balance of power is still gone.