this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
161 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

73512 readers
2896 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 76 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Japan has strict laws against using fake images for food.

Why can't the people we vote for represent us?

[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, the US has similar laws too. It just doesnt matter.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I did more research and you are correct.

15 U.S. Code § 52 - Dissemination of false advertisements - (a) Unlawfulness - It shall be unlawful for any person, partnership, or corporation to disseminate, or cause to be disseminated, any false advertisement—.

Source:law.cornel.edu

Okay. Good.

The term “false advertisement” means an advertisement, other than labeling, which is misleading in a material respect; and in determining whether any advertisement is misleading, there shall be taken into account (among other things) not only representations made or suggested by statement, word, design, device, sound, or any combination thereof, but also the extent to which the advertisement fails to reveal facts material in the light of such representations or material with respect to consequences which may result from the use of the commodity to which the advertisement relates under the conditions prescribed in said advertisement, or under such conditions as are customary or usual.

Source:law.cornel.edu

Good. Good.

if such violation is with intent to defraud or mislead, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine of not more than $5,000 or by imprisonment for not more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment;

Source:law.cornel.edu

No! No! No! So a corporation can just pay $5,000 and throw a designer, who was only following directions, under a bus?!

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Fees should be based on revenue and scale up on repeat offenses. Otherwise it's just "the cost of doing business"

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 10 points 2 days ago

And this is how it should be with all monetary punishments.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also, that's $5000 in 1994 money (if not older).

Surely fines should scale with inflation.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

True but revenue/income hurts a lot more. Corps only listen to the bottom line.

Both Nvidia and Intel and knowingly broken the law and just paid the fine while profits covered the loss.

The system is broken.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because we forgot how effective public lynchings can be.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When a certain saint allegedly shot a CEO dead on the street, there was a big surge in support. Sadly, no one else has followed suit.

A lot of people are sick of the ownership class ruining everything, and would cheer for spilled blood.

If someone shot the ceo of uber dead, people would celebrate. They're all scum.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Well, someone did just follow suit.

[–] AndiHutch@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

Why can’t the people we vote for represent us?

Politicians were never meant to represent us (the people). We the people was war propaganda to revolt against the English and their king. They have, since the founding of the US, represented the business owners (landowners). And even after giving women and black people the right to vote, the system still mostly represents the interest of the business owners.

Bug report closed: System works as intended.

For the politicians to actually represent us, we the people would need to have some sort of broad agreement on what we do and do not want. But unfortunately, the people don't have the needed experience or education to come to that agreement. So instead we get 2 different flavors of politicians serving the owners and none serving the people. Pick your favorite team, but they do not currently represent the people's interest, instead they represent the business owners' interests.

As a people, our job is to attempt to bend the politicians and business owners' to our will using what we currently have at our disposal: our actions and our words. But that still won't get anywhere without many other people backing up our actions and our words with their actions and words. It won't be easy, but it is necessary if we want to shape our societies future. If we don't do it, we get shadowy groups like the heritage foundation doing it for the business owners and pushing it on our leaders.

Also the politicians' job is largely dependent upon them listening to the demands of the businesses lobbyist as of now. If they don't follow their wishes they can expect a harder battle to keep their seat. They would get less big campaign donations and stronger primary challengers as a result of their noncompliance. This makes our job harder since it is difficult to get them to understand something when their job and salary depends upon them not understanding it.

[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Why can’t the people we vote for represent us?

That is easy (for the US at least). Politicians in the US doesn't get elected by a majority.