this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
161 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

73512 readers
2896 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
161
Uber Eats is adding AI to menus, food photos, and reviews (www.theverge.com)
submitted 2 days ago by kebab@endlesstalk.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, the US has similar laws too. It just doesnt matter.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I did more research and you are correct.

15 U.S. Code § 52 - Dissemination of false advertisements - (a) Unlawfulness - It shall be unlawful for any person, partnership, or corporation to disseminate, or cause to be disseminated, any false advertisement—.

Source:law.cornel.edu

Okay. Good.

The term “false advertisement” means an advertisement, other than labeling, which is misleading in a material respect; and in determining whether any advertisement is misleading, there shall be taken into account (among other things) not only representations made or suggested by statement, word, design, device, sound, or any combination thereof, but also the extent to which the advertisement fails to reveal facts material in the light of such representations or material with respect to consequences which may result from the use of the commodity to which the advertisement relates under the conditions prescribed in said advertisement, or under such conditions as are customary or usual.

Source:law.cornel.edu

Good. Good.

if such violation is with intent to defraud or mislead, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine of not more than $5,000 or by imprisonment for not more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment;

Source:law.cornel.edu

No! No! No! So a corporation can just pay $5,000 and throw a designer, who was only following directions, under a bus?!

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Fees should be based on revenue and scale up on repeat offenses. Otherwise it's just "the cost of doing business"

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 10 points 2 days ago

And this is how it should be with all monetary punishments.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also, that's $5000 in 1994 money (if not older).

Surely fines should scale with inflation.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

True but revenue/income hurts a lot more. Corps only listen to the bottom line.

Both Nvidia and Intel and knowingly broken the law and just paid the fine while profits covered the loss.

The system is broken.