this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
989 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

73512 readers
2982 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social 23 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Couldn't people just hire a VPS in another country and VPN with that using Wireguard etc, or even use RDP etc to it? Is it even a VPN if you're remotely operating a computer in another country?

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 50 points 4 days ago (5 children)

WireGuard would be illegal. ISPs would monitor for encrypted traffic streams. All remote workers must now come back to the office. ofcom can see any and all traffic. Your loyalty to the king shall be examined. You choices of media will be scrutinized. The threat of losing your children will be used to force compliance. Welcome to the machine.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Pretty much every single website uses HTTPS these days which means all traffic is encrypted anyway. Instead of a VPN you could use an encrypted proxy that connects over HTTPS. I doubt the UK is just going to completely cut itself off from the rest of the world’s internet (because all it takes is one path out).

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Can we develop a new VPN protocol where the encrypted traffic is disguised as a 24 hour continuous stream of Never Gonna Give You Up

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago
[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I remember in Cory Doctorow's Little Brother (Great read, Free e-book here.) they had an insider at the ISP who just encrypted all the traffic that came through, so it just became the "new normal".

[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Work based VPNs would likely have to obtain a license from Ofcom, it would be highly unlikely to block them completely. Probably be requesting a back door into the work VPNs at the same time just like they have for other encryption, lol.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 1 points 4 days ago

Tempora already snoops on traffic.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Refer to other comment. They don't see "VPN traffic", they see encrypted tunnels between two ports to some offshore vps. At best, they see a header saying "openvpn". The article is alluding to the country effectively wanting to crack down on encrypted tunnels (because you cannot discriminate VPNs from them). At best, maybe they're just christofascist idiots.

[–] elvith@feddit.org 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

At best, they see a TLS handshake that gets upgraded to an encrypted websocket which hides VPN traffic…

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 days ago

And make sure to keep videos running 24/7 through said VPN so they don't know when the packets are interesting vs just YouTube or something

[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 days ago

There will always be a way to bypass laws that do not serve the people.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I have a Digital Ocean droplet in Amsterdam, runs OpenVPN server. $6/mo., no one sees my activity, haven't logged into it in years.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Netherlands is part of the Nine eyes. They know exactly what your activities are.

Whether they choose to chase you down is a different issue.