this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
332 points (98.3% liked)

News

31285 readers
2689 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TJ Hoover was declared brain dead after suffering an overdose in October 2021, but his sister Donna Rhorer says doctors attempted to harvest his organs while he was still showing signs of life.

Rhorer says TJ's eyes were open and tracking movement during his honor walk, when family members gather to say goodbye before organ donation surgery.

"Almost immediately as soon as his honor walk started, his eyes were opened, and they were tracking, looking around at the people that were there," Rhorer said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This smells all kinds of weird.

"Almost immediately as soon as his honor walk started, his eyes were opened, and they were tracking, looking around at the people that were there," Rhorer said.

...and you didn't draw attention to that? That'd be a pretty solid cue to stop the honor walk and get the doc over. Also none of the techs/nurses/doctors noticed??

TJ's declaring physician believed he showed too many signs of life to continue with the surgery, but KODA wanted to proceed anyway.

...and you still declared it, and didn't raise a stink with patient advocacy or the head of the hospital? Or the individual surgeons on the harvest team?

They also don't mention how far they got in the surgery. Like was the anesthesiologist starting to intubate him and noticed his eyes moving and called for a stop before n incision was made? Or were they a kidney or two into the operation?

I've been scrubbed into two organ harvest surgeries; I've been scheduled for five - the other three canceled because the patient didn't meet the super strict criteria as they died. Hospitals are all about covering their ass to avoid situations like the one reported. They'll push you to cut corners on things like room turnover time (which is still fucked) but not things that put them in situations like this.

I'm not familiar with KODA or "Network for Hope", so maybe they're just extra shitty, but take this one with a mountain of salt.

Organ harvests are super important procedures - we don't just have a backstock of healthy livers in the OR core; there's a backlog of deathly ill patients clinging to the hope that their phone rings with news of a match. People are already hesitant to sign up as donors because surgery is genuinely scary as fuck; we don't need half-assed journalism pouring fuel on that fire. If shit is actually happening, by all means report on it, but give enough details to make it credible... or if it's a nothingburger that you're hyping up for clicks, maybe shut the fuck up, cuz that'll prolong peoples' misery / get them killed.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Can you talk about the two surgeries you have been a part of? Also, I never thought about that: they give the dead patients anesthesiology? Why?

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Sure!

Anesthesiologists are known primarily for preventing sensation and awareness, but they manage pretty much all of your body's functions including things like respiration and blood pressure. The conversation about the degree of intervention needed for an organ donor is riddled with an absolute fuckton of conjecture, so if you want to go down that rabbit hole, be mindful of whether or not you're reading a credible source.

Studies in the National Library of Medicine are my personal go-to: here's a good one on this topic: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10355135/ (Crtl+F "Preoperative Role of the Anesthesiologist for Organ Procurement After Brain Death" to jump to the bit that specifically addresses your question).

Reading that, it sounds like anesthesiologists are the primary authority on verifying the legal checkmarks for verification of brain or cardiac death, and ultimately giving the thumbs up or down for the surgery to proceed. I didn't know this - my assumption was that it was the primary care doc's responsibility... so my initial post here probably should have chewed out the anesthesiologist too.


The ones I was in... so I'm a surgical technologist - recently posted a breakdown of my job here. Both of them were brain death due to drug overdose. Organ harvests vary a lot depending on which organs are actually being harvested. The first one I was in was after the pancreas, liver, kidneys, lungs, and heart, so as the tech I had to set up for and do 5 different surgeries at the same time. Each organ system had its own surgeon come in from the donor organization (both of mine were under Life Share). All of them want to move fast to keep the organ tissue as healthy as possible so it stays viable for the recipient, so I felt like the octopus dude from Spiderman madly passing and receiving a slurry of scalpels, hemostats, scissors, and ties. We had 4 'slushers' running to produce sterile ice which we poured a lot into the abdominal and thoracic cavities; and more into basins for the organs to be placed in once they were removed.

As each doc finished, they broke scrub and left immediately with the organ, which was transported straight to the recipient site at some other hospital (iirc the heart was transported by helicopter), so it went from being absolute madness to a kind of eerie stillness. Seeing the donor on the OR bed with the cavities fully exposed and completely empty was pretty unnerving. We did a final sponge/sharps/instrument count (which is done in every surgery to ensure nothing gets left in the wound [every policy has a terrifying backstory]). Sutured the incisions closed, but with much larger 'bites' than normal and all with one running stitch (vs an 'interrupted' stitch where each one has its own length of suture). I think from the OR, the body goes to mortuary or something for postmortem care to make it look as presentable as possible for a funeral - so that stitch is probably removed, and the cavities packed with something to fill in the empty space, but I'm not involved in that part of it, so, speculating on that last bit.

Second one was mostly the same, except they only took the pancreas, kidneys, and liver - other organs were deemed nonviable for whatever reason.

In both of them, we were present for the honor walk, and they told us a bit about the patient. The OR side of things is a mad dash for tissue preservation sake, but the process as a whole was very sensitive to the human side of things. One of the cool things they did in both was asked the family what kind of music the patient liked, and they played it over the OR room speakers through the entire operation. We also got to meet the family, which is about the only time a surg tech ever gets to do that. Typically we're in the actual OR all day - before the case when the doc is talking to you, we're in the room setting up the instruments and such; and afterward we're still in the room tearing down and setting up for the next one. The organ harvests were much more personal.

Happy to answer any questions, but keep in mind as the tech I'm the literal rock-bottom of the OR food chain, so some of my answers might be "No idea!" followed by speculation.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

That was an awesome read, thank you!

Probably to suppress involuntary reflexes, I'm not a doctor