this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
598 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

73254 readers
4391 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

So we have two camps.

  1. It's a tool to be used and it's a good thing to exists and I have it enabled forever

  2. Keep a gun pointed at it at all occasions and even if you use it, do so with heavy restrictions

I trust my partner and my partner trusts me but the idea of stalking her via app is mindboggling and, honestly, disgusting to me. Like a dog on a leash, always observed, always controlled. That's some mind disease shit going on. Trust your partner dammit. Ya all have issues.

On the other hand though being violently agaisnt it cuz "oh my god privacy" is also funny. The recipent is your partner. Setting it up for some specific use case shouldn't be a bother. It can be extremely usefull for example for grabbing shit in a mall - if you are not interested in going to the same shop, enable it, split, get what you need, join back, disable it.

What I am getting at is - it's a tool, but an invasive and overly controlling one. Use it how you wish but do not perceive having it on constantly as normal. It literally sounds disgusting.

Edit: For people talking about privacy - we're on lemmy. We all know how tracking works. An even if you have localisation off, your device will connect to local wifi and smart appliances to log your location anyway. So I am not really invested into discusing overall practice of having location on - only on sharing saud location.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The recipent is your partner.

And provider of whatever service you use to share your location. Being a bit paranoid about your privacy in this day and age is not just fearmongering and tinfoil-hats.

It can be extremely usefull for example for grabbing shit in a mall

Or communicate in advance that it'll take 30 minutes for you to find your shit and then meet up at a cafe, by car, at lobby or whatever. Live location doesn't add anything to that, assuming it even works reliably enough inside buildings.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Live location doesn’t add anything

Yeah, seriously, how did society function before GPS?

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

The specified recipient is your partner.

But that data gets created, so it's vulnerable. Commercial aps on your phone, sketchy apps youve never heard of like facebook, google services, and potentially something from your carrier, plus the government in mosy cases, will have access, phone home, record it.

Then it gets transmitted to your partner somebody('s code) does this. Even if it's e2ee, you need a program to do that, abd the general rule with phone apps is that your data is being sold.

Then it gets to your partners phone, where it is again vulnerable to third parties their apps etc.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

My wife and I have our location shared with each other 24/7. Furthermore, my sister also has mine and my wife has her sister's. It has nothing to do with trust and everything to do with safety. Perhaps the real trust is not assuming your partner will use your location to control you.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

For me, privacy is safety. The thing im most worried about is the government snatching me up in the night.

Yay, threat profiles!

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Well, seems that having a trusted party with your location would help with that, fellow inhabitant of a fascist regime.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Please !ever get within fifty feet of anyone doijg anything you think is remotely spicy, for your safety and theirs.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

You're a danger to yourself and those around you. And it doesn't seem malevolent, which is scarier.

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Being tracked is control enough for me. But I do understand it in dangerous situations, returning through forest at night etc.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

I don't see it as being tracked, though. I trust my wife (and my sister) to not be checking it 24/7.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 0 points 20 hours ago

No, that is creepy and you have just normalized it.