this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
547 points (99.8% liked)

politics

24746 readers
2232 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Democratic congresswoman has given a scathing review of the Trump administration’s so-called “Alligator Alcatraz” in Florida, describing it as an “internment camp” that needs to be “shut the hell down.”

Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who represents Florida's 25th congressional district, said that pictures of the facility “don’t do it justice” and that detainees were being “packed into cages.”

On Saturday Florida lawmakers from both parties took a state-arranged tour of the new 3,000-bed detention center that the state rapidly built on an isolated airstrip surrounded by swampland in the Everglades.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

Auschwitz was an extermination camp, not a concentration camp. This is more like Dachau. Pretty accurately like Dachau I'd even say.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Look, if you put people in "concentration camps" until they die, wouldn't that be an extermination camp, even if you aren't doing anything to accelerate their deaths?

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No, because words have meaning. People also died in the original concentration camps - they were still distinct from the extermination camps.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

Auschwitz 1 was a concentration camp, Auschwitz 2 (Auschwitz-Birkenau) was an extermination camp

Also please stop using the euphemisms the Nazis used. It's an extermination camp.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Euphemisms are meaningless once the connotation settle in. No person alive in the modern civilization can heart the term "concentration camp" and think "oh, this is not so bad then".

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Alligator Auschwitz will be an extermination camp, but the "oopsie, the residents all died of heatstroke and dehydration, maybe they shouldn't have been illegally entered the country" kind.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Anne Frank didn't die in a gas chamber; she died of typhus. Putting people in a place full of health hazards where they will not get proper medical care is a form of extermination.

[–] offspec@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Yeah let's weaken our political messaging for the camp where acting forces want to feed the latino population to alligators in the name of pedantry! Fuck the fact that most Americans would probably guess Dachau is a cheese or something, and that Auschwitz is certainly the most recognizable of the camps taught from the holocaust, we want to be 5% more correct!

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I mean. They built it in the middle of a swamp. I wouldn't be surprised if the next time that area gets a particularly heavy rain it'll morph into an extermination camp in a matter of hours.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 2 hours ago

The facility is comprised of tents, in a gator and snake infested swamp in southern Florida, one of the most active hurricane regions on the planet. The first hurricane or tropical storm that comes through there is going to destroy that place, and put those people at mortal risk.

[–] InternetRando@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I nominate "Donalds Dachau". Would that work for you?

[–] InternetRando@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 3 hours ago

YES👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

You're right, BUT -

this is a majorly fucked up timeline when people are complaining that it's too mean to call a US concentration camp "Auschwitz" when it's clearly just harmless little "Dachau." Dachau led to Auschwitz and if the normalization of it is any indication, it WILL happen again here. THAT'S why people are calling it that - we've seen this shit before and know how it ends.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Well, in Germany we got hammered it in that any likening of anything that was not part of the Holocaust to parts of the Holocaust is inherently antisemitic and a new form of nazism. The Holocaust is supposed to be unique and special forever, as no one is as good at exterminating people like we Germans are and Jews are the eternal victims, hence Israel can't do any wrong. Conveniently ignoring how other victims of the Holocaust such as Sinti and Roma are still facing rampant systemic discrimination in Germany and also that understanding of Jewish victims being limited to Israelis or people loyal to Israel, whereas Jews who criticize Israel face various forms of repression in Germany.

Now obviously that isn't the way it is taught directly, but it does involve a sick guilt pride on the one hand and the immediate shut down of any criticism of anything that actually does have parallels to aspects of the Nazi regime and the Holocaust. Or well, that is as long as the criticism is geared towards our allies such as the US and Israel.

Unfortunately the whole debate has been deeply intoxicated and instrumentalized in the "Staatsräson" logic of unconditional support for any and every atrocity, as long as it serves the current Israeli state and its government.

From the best attempt of a neutral perspective: In Auschwitz the Nazis murdered about 1.5 Million people. At its peak there were about 150,000 - 200,000 people concentrated there. From medicinal experiments on humans to random acts of brutal violence there has been all sorts of further gruesome atrocities piled on top of the systematic extermination. So in terms of scale the comparison really cannot come even remotely close.

I do agree with you that these atrocities escalate and escalate quickly, when left unchallenged. The idea that Germany, Israel, the US or anyone other state entity truly learned a lesson of humanity from the horrors of the Holocaust and there would be a certain prevention unfortunately also is wrong. I remember how in school everybody was like "i could have never done this" or "i would have fought against this, how could the people?!" and now we see the same writings on the wall here in Germany again and most people do fuck all, if they don't already openly embrace it

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 55 minutes ago

The Holocaust is supposed to be unique and special forever, as no one is as good at exterminating people like we Germans are

I hate how often people act like this is the case. We Americans will soon be making "the" Holocaust "a" Holocaust and prove that the Germans were not somehow unique in committing crimes against humanity, and I hate that so many of us are this fucking stupid and evil.

[–] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago

I see it another way.

By the time Auschwitz happened it was already way too late to oppse the Nazi Regime. It was too late to save lifes and prevent tragedy. But at Dachau it wasn't.

It also makes it seem like this (Donalds Dachau) is the endgame. Like this is the worst they will do. When they will in fact do much worse.

By calling it an Auschwitz, I feel we're kind of throwing a towel and telling ourselves that the MAGA-Regime is already too powerful. It isn't. They're only just starting, they can still be stopped. It also makes it seem like this is the height of their tyranny, which it isn't. Noone should stay at home thinking "well, it isn't that bad" but instead go to the streets thinking "it mustn't get worse"

Also we all know that Dachau isn't "harmless" in any way, and my comment should be pretty clear that it was awful. Comparing it to dachau isn't normalizing it, it isn't disrespectful, because it's what gets closest to it. On the other hands it can be seen as disrespectful to all those who suffered and even perished in Birkenau to be compared to "Donalds Dachau".

Lastly let me assure you that I am NOT, as implied in your comment, defending the current US-Regime nor normalizing Dachau.