this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
470 points (99.8% liked)

politics

24746 readers
2997 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Democratic congresswoman has given a scathing review of the Trump administration’s so-called “Alligator Alcatraz” in Florida, describing it as an “internment camp” that needs to be “shut the hell down.”

Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who represents Florida's 25th congressional district, said that pictures of the facility “don’t do it justice” and that detainees were being “packed into cages.”

On Saturday Florida lawmakers from both parties took a state-arranged tour of the new 3,000-bed detention center that the state rapidly built on an isolated airstrip surrounded by swampland in the Everglades.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] InternetRando@lemmy.myserv.one 103 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

STOP CALLING IT ALCATRAZ.

Alcatraz was for criminals who were found guilty in a trial.

This is AUSCHWITZ

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

On one hand, yes. On the other hand, every time I hear potential terrible plans on social media, it seems like they take it as a guide.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

"Now that we're here, what should we do?" "Gee, I don't know Tom. Let's see what the liberals on Reddit are crying about and do that."

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No. This is Dachau. They're not yet at the stage where they operate gas chambers. They'll get there soon enough, though.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 hours ago

Auschwitz did not start as an extermination camp, either.

[–] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

Auschwitz was an extermination camp, not a concentration camp. This is more like Dachau. Pretty accurately like Dachau I'd even say.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Look, if you put people in "concentration camps" until they die, wouldn't that be an extermination camp, even if you aren't doing anything to accelerate their deaths?

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

No, because words have meaning. People also died in the original concentration camps - they were still distinct from the extermination camps.

[–] offspec@lemmy.world 2 points 53 minutes ago

Yeah let's weaken our political messaging for the camp where acting forces want to feed the latino population to alligators in the name of pedantry! Fuck the fact that most Americans would probably guess Dachau is a cheese or something, and that Auschwitz is certainly the most recognizable of the camps taught from the holocaust, we want to be 5% more correct!

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 minutes ago

I mean. They built it in the middle of a swamp. I wouldn't be surprised if the next time that area gets a particularly heavy rain it'll morph into an extermination camp in a matter of hours.

[–] InternetRando@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 58 minutes ago

I nominate "Donalds Dachau". Would that work for you?