this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
731 points (98.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

33022 readers
4404 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] knight_alva@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It’s a poor definition because gift exchanges are strictly voluntary and non-reciprocal engagements. I’m not saying what he did was ok or even legal in other contexts. My only point is that I wouldn’t consider this fraud because the victims were not compelled to give. This isn’t a Nigerian prince scam where the victims were promised greater returns at a later date. These victims gave with the expectation of monetary loss.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Seems to fit the official definition pretty neatly. Colloquially, I tend to agree with you, there's a spectrum for fraud. But this still counts as fraud. It's a fraudulent misrepresentation of the truth to convince others to part with something of value (a gift).

The fact that it's a gift doesn't change that this is fraud, only the severity of fraud in a legal sense.

collapsed inline media

[–] Hackworth@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

intentional perversion of truth in order to induce another to part with something of value

Advertising and politics?

laws don't apply to politicians.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
  1. image of text: there's this cool alternative called text that doesn't break the web or accessibility. linking to source & quoting text makes an altogether better web for everyone.
  2. dictionary definition: not an official, legal definition.

great, y'all want to get into Japanese criminal legal definitions?

[–] knight_alva@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Fraud in the sense that the guy is lying and profiting from it, sure. But the common / google definition of a word and the legal definition/ application of that word are two completely different things.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 5 points 22 hours ago

By that logic, fake fundraisers and romance scams shouldn't be illegal either.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So, it's not fraud if I tell my grandma with dementia that it's my birthday once a week so she keeps giving me birthday checks?

[–] knight_alva@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your grandma having dementia changes the formula a bit.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Not really, no. It's still using deception for material gain through gift giving. Maybe it's more of an extreme case, but I was being hyperbolic.

[–] knight_alva@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It is materially different because a person with dementia can’t legally advocate for themselves so it is easier for an action against them to be considered a crime.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago

It's still using deception for material gain. Just because it's harder to scam someone without dementia doesn't make it not fraud.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

They're technically voluntary but also socially expected. I'm not sure about birthday gifts in particular but Japan is a country where if you go on holiday somewhere you're expected to bring a gift for each of your coworkers, and people will think worse of you for not doing that. I'd be kind of surprised if omitting birthday gifts for your romantic partner without prior agreement is a real option.