this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
448 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

72017 readers
3042 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A profound relational revolution is underway, not orchestrated by tech developers but driven by users themselves. Many of the 400 million weekly users of ChatGPT are seeking more than just assistance with emails or information on food safety; they are looking for emotional support.

“Therapy and companionship” have emerged as two of the most frequent applications for generative AI globally, according to the Harvard Business Review. This trend marks a significant, unplanned pivot in how people interact with technology.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 136 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Almost like questioning an AI is free while a therapist costs a LOT of money.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 60 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There are other causes here.

They've been talking for a while about how the low participation in dating by Gen Z women is because they're tired of being the entire support system for men experiencing a loneliness epidemic.

It's a lot of pressure for the women to be under, and so they're withdrawing.

I'm guessing this is one of the driving forces as well. Lack of real, emotionally intimate human connections around them. Many men are quite fucked in that regard right now.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The flip side of that is vast numbers of Gen Z Men saying many Gen Z women are basically misandrists, who asked them to stop interacting with them unprompted, no more unwanted attention... so they did that, they stopped... and now all they see is IG and TikToks of Gen Z Women complaining that no one asks them out on dates anymore, no one is 6' tall with a 6 figure income becore the age of 30, and willing to worship them as a queen.

I am not saying this is any kind of objectively accurate to whatever degree, but I am saying that this is the very common, general vibe.

So, in that situation: Why bother?

Many men can actually be fulfilled just staying actually single, as in not even dating single, snd getting their own lives, finances, health, to a better place.

Yes this does though also mean that ... because we've just got less general, face to face socialization going on that... basically a larger than otherwise number of them will basically develop harmful, reinforcing neuroses, in harmful echo chambers... but at the same time, that applies to women as well.

This is what happens when you jam a broad economic collapse up alongside a highly digital and publicized modern media landscape that is tweaked all to fuck to highlight and push the most extreme version of everything... along with extremely mixed messaging that an only digitally socialized person recieves, but all as a firehose, that is very hard to make true sense of.

So... fuck this shit I'm out... social withdrawal... basically becomes a reasonable mental health improving move, even if it does leave you kinda socially stunted as compared to pre-internet generations.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

amen. best thing i ever did for my mental, physical and financial health was to stop dating.

most women I ever dated were nothing but a total drain on my well-being, and did almost nothing to contribute to it positively. the only women who were ever really a net positive to me were female friends who encouraged me in my interests and passions and who shared those same ones with me.

Sadly I've never been able to date anyone who saw my passions as a positive... just a negative becuase often their soul interest in the world was getting money, attention, and generating drama out of our relationship so they could 'feel feelings'. So many ladies see relationships as nothing more than drug dispensing feel good machines (the same women who think all men want is sex... ironically). People need to realize that relationships are way more than that.

I remember so many times trying to have serious talk with my girlfriends and they just... got uncomfortable or just tried to sex me up to shut me up. They dind't want to deal with anything serious or adult. And these were adult women in their 30s. The only adult things they wanted to talk about was vacation plans or restaurants.

But it sucks, as happy as I am alone I want something more. I want a family and kids and to contribute to society in that way, but frankly, I don't really meet any women who want that. They just seem to want to be consumers first and foremost and productive members of society who care about more than themsevles... is not really on their wishlist.

I have been volunteering a lot, but it's really not the same. It's nice, but like working out, it doesn't feel like it's really going anywhere other than just staving off the inevitable decline as best I can. All my volunteer work just is a tiny drop of givnig a shit in the massive bucket of neglect that is our society as we amuse ourselves to death via social media and consumer trends.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 28 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

because they're tired of being the entire support system for men experiencing a loneliness epidemic.

I've got no horse in this race but it appears that 'men should not be afraid to open up' articles and tweets were followed by 'men, we are not your therapist'.

🤷‍♂️

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 23 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm a therapist who works almost exclusively with men. Here one pattern I've seen often:

  • Man is conditioned from a young age not to identify, process or express his feelings
  • Man doesn't share his feelings with anyone - friends, family, partners - for years
  • Man sees woman as safe, caring and validating
  • Man confides in woman only and continues not sharing feelings with others
  • Woman becomes overwhelmed, resentful, dismissive
  • Man gets the message that he never should have opened up in the first place

It can be true both that men need to open up more and should not treat their partners as therapists. We all need support systems because no one person can always be available to give us everything we need. It's not wrong to confide in a partner, but if that partner is the only confidant it's precarious for both. And I want to emphasize this is not the fault of a man, or men as a community. This is the result of generations of conditioning from both men and women, and both men and women play a part in the solution. I also want to recognize that many of us don't have a network of people we could open up to even if we wanted to, and many more can't afford therapy.

If anyone reading this can afford therapy, I highly recommend it. It's a place to undo some of that conditioning, to sit with someone who's committed to listening, caring, and not judging.

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

man is conditioned from a young age not to show feelings

I feel like you skipped over this part way too quickly. Myself and other men have been hearing things like "it's not manly to cry", "whining isn't going to do anything for you", "being weak is girly", and countless other things for my entire memorable life

And it's not just men telling me this. It's men, women, adults, my classmates, teachers and mentors.

It's not a good thing. And it's changing now, which is so good. But man hearing that from your earliest memories makes it really set in.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

Thank you for expanding on that point. I meant it to be a "here's how we got here" before the rest of my "this is where we are today."

You're totally right, and any conversation about men's behavior at large should include the experiences you just described. Even though we didn't get ourselves into this situation - in that we didn't raise ourselves - we're the ones who will get us out.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

🤔

That’s interesting… had never seen it put that way before…

It’s almost like telling men that it’s okay to show your feelings is bullshit lol

[–] zerozaku@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Do you think this therapist is trying to market therapy and increase his business? I also think the same 🤨

/j

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

Because they want us to open up, just not to them. T

The irony is so many anti-patriachical feminists, still desire the patriachy. They still want dominant tall wealthy men to romance then, but at the same time they claim to wait to tear these men down into some genderless socialist utopia... where they'd never want to ahve sex with any of the 'ideal' men they believe woudl exist in this society.

You can't have it both ways.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago

I think there's a lot more to it than cost. Men, even with considerable health care resources, are often very averse to mental health care.

Thinking of my father in law, for example, I don't know how much you would have to pay him to get him into a therapist's office, but I'm certain he wouldn't go for free.

[–] Guidy@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Also talking to ChatGPT, if done anonymously, won’t ruin your career.

(Thinking of AD military, where they tell you help is available but in reality it will and maybe should cost you your security clearance.)

[–] MrLLM@ani.social 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

won’t ruin your career

Granted, but it still will suck a fuck ton of coal produced electricity.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

One chat request to an LLM produces about as much CO2 as burning one droplet of gasoline (if it was from coal fired power, less if it comes from cleaner sources). It makes far less CO2 to talk to a chatbot for hours upon hours than a ten minute drive to see a therapist once a week.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Yeah, but also one of them is helpful and the other is the exact opposite. If the choices are AI therapist or no therapist, you are still better off with no therapist.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's what I'm doing. That and screaming into a pillow most nights.

I don’t scream into a pillow. I just wake up at dawn and have a panic attack until I have to actually move.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that's easy to say, but when someone is in a crisis, I would be wrong to judge then for talking to an AI (shitty terrible solution) instead of a therapist that can be unaffordable and also comes with a risk of then being terrible.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

a terrible therapist at least has an ethics board

a terrible therapist at least has evidence-based interventions on their side

a terrible therapist at lest has the fact that ~80% of positive outcomes have nothing to do with the interventions or anything the therapist does besides show up and be cool (a statistic I remember quite well from grad school)

AI has none of these things

therapy isn't fucking magic. it's a relationship. you can't have a relationship with an LLM. there's no such thing as AI therapy, you're just training it to tell you about CBT worksheets while you bitch about your problems like you're in a nail salon

[–] Guidy@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

The best therapist in the world can still end your career by causing your clearance to be revoked or rendering you unqualified for your unit’s mission.

(Suicide is a big problem in the military, I lost a buddy to it.)

The cheapest therapist in the world may still not be covered by your insurance. (And nothing you write in reply will alter that.)

They should work to make AI therapy better while keeping it totally anonymous. If it were really good it would be the number one use for running a local and disconnected and air gapped LLM: perfectly private therapy with no “we just use telemetry to improve our product” bullshit.

Then maybe a lot more men would seek help/talk about their thoughts and feelings.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 1 points 10 hours ago

The best therapist in the world can still end your career by causing your clearance to be revoked or rendering you unqualified for your unit’s mission.

I'm not in the military but I've worked with ts/sci cleared folks at a tech company, and this sounds odd to me. Can you explain a little more here? What's an example of a problem that, if discussed in therapy, could result in revocation of a security clearance?

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social -2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

They can’t make it better… you can’t have a relationship with an autocorrect

ok.

but the problem is that real therapy is expensive, and unaccessible, while AI is freely accessible, even though it's shit.

and open ai is profiting from that.

I'm just saying the blame should be aimed at the corporations and the healthcare system, rather than someone who is desperate for help

a terrible therapist can lock you in a room, some people don't want that risk

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago

I'd be interested on a study there.

I lot of therapy is taking emotions and verbalising them so that the rational part of the brain can help in dealing with things. Even a journal can help with that, so talking to an inanimate machine doesn't seem stupid to me.

However therapists guide the conversation to challenge the patient, break reinforcing cycles, but in a way that doesn't cause trauma. A chatbot isn't going to be the same.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

I'm gonna need a source on that.