I have acknowledged that there is a genocide hundreds of times, check my comment history, and I can say it again: fuck Israel and fuck the IDF, they are commuting genocide and the world is standing by either helping or not stopping them. I don't see any harm in repeating it again.

Now: The American people decided who wins the election, not dems. Not the DNC. Not George Soros. If the American people really didn't want genocide they would elect candidates in primaries that were anti genocide (they didn't) or they would vote for the candidate who wanted to just maintain the genocide as it is instead of accelerating it (they didn't).

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (11 children)

But every time we said the dems were doing a genocide we were supposed to say that Trump would somehow be worse, but when you complain about us talking about the dems' complicity in genocide, somehow you don't have to mention that it's a genocide? Because you didn't do that.

And despite the fact that you acknowledge the dems are complicit in genocide, you have no criticism of that becuase... something about democracy?

Also if the electorate wants genocide that badly, then why is it bad if we put the genocide at their feet? Aren't we helping them in that case? What are you upset about then?

If the American people really didn't want genocide they would elect candidates in primaries that were anti genocide (they didn't) or they would vote for the candidate who wanted to just maintain the genocide as it is instead of accelerating it (they didn't).

You should say, "Yes, that's my favourite genocider! A vote for Joe is a vote for genocide!" waves tiny plastic flag

Your genocide apologia is breaking your brain.

You could also learn the most basic facts about the US electoral system and understand that it is not democratic in the slightest, and people do not have a meaningful chance to vote for what they want.

[–] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

Pick a lane to acuse me of, you're all over the place. Do you think I like genocide or that I want to minimize it?

My point is very clear: people complaining about dems support of genocide while being silent about gop support (including "genocide Joe" chanters, 3rd party voters and non-voters), helped trump win and are responsible for the next 4 years of turbo genocide. Maybe even for some unpaid vacation in Iran.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think you think the electorate likes genocide, or at least you said so, so I don't understand why you think accusing Joe of genocide would have lost an election.

If the American people really didn't want genocide they would elect candidates in primaries that were anti genocide (they didn't) or they would vote for the candidate who wanted to just maintain the genocide as it is instead of accelerating it (they didn't).

people complaining about dems support of genocide while being silent about gop support (including "genocide Joe" chanters, 3rd party voters and non-voters), helped trump win and are responsible for the next 4 years of turbo genocide

This isn't hard to figure out, but I guess my brain isn't broken by genocide apologia so I maybe I can't understand.

[–] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Electorate =/= swing voters

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's weak, doesn't explain anything, and I think I'm done giving oxygen to a genocide denier.

[–] Tja@programming.dev -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And I'm done discussing with a kid rapist.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

At least you didn't spend that comment on genocide denial, so let's call it an improvement.

[–] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

At least you commented instead of diddling kids, so win-win.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I just want to point out that you've given up trying to make an argument and are now simply calling the other person a pedophile. That's about the biggest admission you can make that you have nothing to say.

[–] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, I though we are just exchanging made up accusations. If that is an admission, they ran out of things to say first.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That was me, actually, and I didn't run out, it is still valid. You are denying that we should criticise the dems for their genocide, and you haven't gone back on that. That is a kind of genocide denial.

Your entire point in calling me a pedophile was that you literally could not substantiate it. You were talking out of your ass. You were done with any sort of argument.

It's amazing that you don't see what that says about you, just like you don't seem to see what an absolute repudiation of the democrats it is to say that it is useless to accuse them of genocide because the choices in your "democracy" cannot exclude genocide.

And you wonder why so many people stayed home.

It was already turbo genocide, and the idea that what's happening now is somehow worse is just your fantasy.

[–] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 2 weeks ago

I also drink water. That's also kind of genocide denial.

load more comments (8 replies)