this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
314 points (96.4% liked)

World News

47479 readers
1801 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OutForARip@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

I doubt they can beat the US, but I hope Iran wins.

Terrorists like Israel need to be eliminated.

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 74 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'd rather prefer both sides losing.

And then a proper democratic revolution on both sides again.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 11 points 1 day ago

Yes please! I can't stand either regime.

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 0 points 15 hours ago

Only both of those? Shouldn't the united snake and china both lose too?

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Lemmy straight up cheering theocratic terrorists

[–] 10001110101@lemm.ee 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The Iranian regime is fucking awful, the Israeli one is just even more awful such that Iran still seem like the good guys in comparison. Its like two assholes fighting, they're both assholes but one clearly started it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago (16 children)

Do you really want Iran to have nukes though?

Just because Israel are horrible, doesn't automatically make the people they're fighting the good guys.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

Honestly no but if I lived in a country or bloc without nukes myself I'd want my government to get them because its the only way to not get randomly regime changed whenever the US, UK or Russia feels like it. Totally understandable why they would want them.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Was Iran actually producing nuclear weapons?

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Iran has multiple enrichment sites, with a reported 83.7% pure U-235. Such purity is only needed for one thing, and it isn't nuclear power plants which typically only need 3%-5% U-235.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Haleu fuel is pretty common that’s enriched up to about 20%. Highly enriched fuel is still used for nuclear power on aircraft carriers that use 93% enriched U235.

Iran is definitely just trying to make weapons but wanted to at least give some examples of higher enriched fuels

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Being that we know Iran sells weapons to Russia, I wonder where it would be cheaper to produce weapons. Would it be cheaper for Russia to pay to have certain things created elsewhere or in Russia. We know a lot of Russia's weapons in the past were built in what now is Ukraine. Examples would be their Aircraft Carriers, destroyers, etc. Hell one of their main Aircraft Carriers was named Kiev

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Every credible comment I've read says they're in the process of developing them, the only group who says otherwise is Iran themselves.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Do you really want Iran to have nukes though?

Iran has the right to defend themselves. Without nukes, they're going to end up like Iraq, Libya, or the countless other countries that Israel and the US felt like destroying. They're champing at the bit to smash Iran to pieces and it's not going to stop at limiting nuclear capabilities.

[–] Renohren@lemmy.today -1 points 22 hours ago

Hasn't Iran a religious edict stating they cannot build or use nukes? We could be in a iraki WMD phase again (expecting Powell's jar to appear any moment now).

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

given how the US lost so many recent wars, I wouldn't consider the US a military power.

they are great at funneling taxpayer money to shareholders pockets. but they can't win against the protest people in the world.

they invade, try to set up a puppet state, then leave with the tail between their legs.

[–] nimisnimi@lemmy.ca 2 points 22 hours ago

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.

Ironically, many have tried (so now we know the result. And the proverb)...

[–] Crankenstein@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This. People don't like it when I say the US is a Paper Tiger. uS power doesn't come from its military strength but from its economic strength.

If pushed hard, it would crumble. The only reason the US has military bases all over is to scare those countries into submission to exploit their workforce. Yet, all those bases are fucking expensive to just maintain. If those countries resisted, then the US loses its economic strength gained from their exploitation, and its military crumbles when it cannot afford to satisfy both it's military contracts and maintain its presence abroad.

Not to mention the internal turmoil when the citizens experience the affects on society when the oligarchy can't subsidize the consumerist lifestyle anymore. Thought that's happening already thanks to the imperial boomerang.

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

you taught me the term "paper tiger" thanks.

[–] Crankenstein@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

You are welcome, prehistoric arthropod from the Cambrian period.

[–] Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago

Give me whatever it is you're smoking cause it's probably a helluva drug.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

The only way that "Iran" can win is if/when the people overthrow the Supreme Dictator

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

Israel is the US

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 0 points 15 hours ago

It's really hard to think china won't intervene for economical interests