If you think critics of wokeness are wrong, then show why. Don’t just insult them and pretend that counts as insight.
Why would someone take the time to explain something to someone arguing in bad faith? Sounds like a foolish endeavor.
I'll leave you with the words from OP elsewhere in this thread because it equally applies to you:
Thanks, but I didn’t ask that and your assertion is based on your own bias/opinion
Yes I had an inflammatory response. I honestly don't perceive OP as making a good faith argument when they say "negative effects of wokeness". It's a thought terminating cliche.
Every stripe and star on the flag represents a genocide in the past, and an ongoing genocide in the present.
Regarding the present genocide of natives: https://youtu.be/WCpgv4OOJCs
Some amendments are more equal than others.
Okay then, swap out AI with wokeness, it still doesn't come to the level of a "worldview". It is still an observation.
everyone who disagrees with my worldview is a bot
I hardly consider my opinion on AI a "worldview". It is an observation that generative AI use in decision making and creativity reduces cognitive activity. Yes I asked OP to disprove me in an "ad-hominem" manner though. I guess we violently agree on that?
Not really... AI bots are bad at providing value because they have no values and don't understand context. You can deliver a scathing reproach that has value as long as it fits the context and reflects your values. But do you consider your response an ad-hominem?
You are right in that I never answered the question asked. However, I would not say the conversation is a nonstarter, I asked you a question and you answered it well. That sounds like a discussion to me...
Misled people always learn the wrong lessons every time.
You never replied to the question in the post.
I think you might be hallucinating.
Seriously. Men are perceived as dangerous by default and that influences how we think about solving problems.
That's an interesting conjecture and at some point you have to wonder if there was malice instead of incompetence advising the campaign.