Not too surprised. They have really improved their controller support over the last few years. I am able to play the game without issue with my HTPC using a controller.
voytrekk
It would be nice if we had both options. Let people matchmake for the default experience and let those that prefer custom servers to use those instead. There are problems with using only community hosted servers, such as game rules and less ideal admins.
That being said, the longevity that community servers offer is likely the reason they have been scrapped by EA. They want everyone to move to the next title that comes out like what people do with CoD.
EDIT: Typos from mobile
Next 3.5 years if we are lucky.
If our goal is to transition more users to Linux, good Nvidia support is a must. Nvidia is the biggest player in the market and that means plenty of users switching will have an nvidia GPU.
That is how it has been for a long time at Microsoft. They know Enterprise is where the money is, it hasn't stopped them from trying to venture out into other areas tho.
I doubt Windows is the reason these are more expensive. Microsoft wants Windows in the handheld PC space, so they are likely to provide licenses for free and likely help subsidize the costs a bit, especially if they include trials for gamepass.
They are allowed to chill their own speech. The government does not have the right to restrict speech, at least in the US.
You can have certain jobs run based on what directories or files were modified. If projectA was the only one modified, it can run just projectA's tests.
It tests passing is a requirement of merging, then you should set the tests as required.
True, but some people may not have a choice because of work or family.
That would reduce the value of buying an RDNA4 GPU, so I don't see that happening.
The Battlefield community doesn't want that kind of movement in their game. If people want to play a shooter with that kind of movement, they can just stick with CoD.