skisnow

joined 3 months ago
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah keep ranting and accusing people of mass murder for not voting for your guy, that’ll win us over

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (4 children)

You do realize this is exactly the kind of melodramatic over-the-top garbage that puts people off wanting to engage with politics in the first place, yeah?

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

yeah I thought it looked kind of gay notthattheresanythingwrongwiththat

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 hours ago

America bad

unironically

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 hours ago

It's always been an absolute and complete source of bafflement to me how many people don't seem to get this. I'm a (relatively) high earner and have no hesitation voting for the most left wing candidate on the ballot, because I think it represents good value to pay a few extra percent in tax to not have to be scared walking down the street or to keep checking my home security cameras. What's the point having wealth if I'm constantly having to protect it?

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 12 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (10 children)

Allowing the Democratic Party to keep fielding right-of-center neoliberals who've consistently and repeatedly made concessions to the far right over the last four decades without ever demanding anything back, and allowed them to shift the Overton Window way over to Nazi territory, is NOT harm reduction. If you hadn't been such cowards the last three elections, there could have been a credible opposition party by now, but no, you're just going to keep chickening out every single "most important election in history" (aka every election ever).

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 hours ago (6 children)

Yeah, it's the height of cluelessness that Democrats act like anyone who isn't a Trump supporter somehow owes their vote to the Democratic Party. If the only thing your party has to offer is Not Being Republicans then why should anyone owe them anything.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 hours ago

I'm starting to wonder if there isn't a concerted op going on to whip people into believing in an unending two party system forever.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (4 children)

I can’t follow the point you seem to be trying to make.

The point is that it's really easy to point at stuff after the fact like it's obvious. Take for example your mention of flags; the World Wide Web Consortium recommends against their use, because countries aren't languages, and so the use of flags to represent them is potentially contentious depending on what market you're selling your product in and which flag you choose. Any screwup you make there would be really easy for some smartass to show up afterwards and say "well obviously you shouldn't use a Taiwan flag to represent Traditional Chinese if you're selling in China, dumbass, you shouldn't need special training to know that... and while we're at it, at least a few of the 8 million Ukrainians who speak Russian probably aren't keen on identifying themselves in their profile with a Russian flag either".

Again, and I feel like I'm repeating myself here, my point isn't that you're incorrect, it's that getting on your high horse about it and calling people dumb is kind of a neckbeard move because every aspect of i18n has the potential to make anyone look dumb.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago (8 children)

Nobody's arguing that it's the right way to do it, we're just saying that breaking out words like "dumb" after the fact from the comfort of our keyboards, over problems that aren't necessarily obvious at development time if you've not had i18n training, is kind of harsh.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 15 points 18 hours ago (11 children)

Yes, this one. i18n was a three day training course at my last workplace, because things that seem really obvious if you’re an Arabic speaker browsing a Russian website, aren’t at all visible to the original developer who has their environment set to English, develops in English, puts all the frontend labels in a “messages” config file to be sent for translation by another department in another country, and will likely never even see the end result.

view more: next ›