scholar

Thank you Dr House

Then the person at the front of the queue must clear their throat until you realise your mistake and return to the back of the queue.

By all means correct me if I'm wrong, but genetic research is a broad field and advancements in one area do not necessarily lead to advancements in others. GMO crops have been around for decades now and I fail to see the value of what these researchers are attempting to do.

Desktop: Octiron
Laptop: Octogen
Phone: Octarine

No, fluffy mice is not a step in the direction of heat adapted humans.

We already do genetic modification for crops and disease research, bringing back mammoth lookalikes won't help with that. There is no problem being solved here, the only end goal is chasing headlines to be able to say 'we brought back mammoths'. It's a pointless egotistical endeavour that helps no-one.

It's not going to happen. Genetic experiments on humans is banned in many countries and even if that weren't the case you're talking about an enormously expensive social program of intervening in an entire generation at conception. Maybe a few billionaires would do it, but they can afford to live comfortably anyway and they don't care if a few serfs die of heat exhaustion.

Something productive like finding a fire extinguisher, or productive like recreating fluffy elephants into an ecosystem that no longer exists?

I was being sarcastic, I don't want bio-engineered humans adapted for extreme heat, I want us to not let our planet get to that point in the first place.

I want them to stop pretending that resurrecting a cold adapted species into an ecosystem that is rapidly melting will do anything productive.

If they want to be helpful they can work out how to engineer humans that can survive 40 degree heat and breathe co2.

The spell killed all the flowers in the field

If by 'more pleasant texture' you mean 'no texture whatsoever' then yes, I suppose so.