loaExMachina

I recommend you check out "The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness" by Michelle Alexander.

The basic getaway from the book is this: Segregationists didn't go anywhere, and since the time of Ronald Reagan, the ways the segregationists found to keep black people down are mostly related to the economy and law enforcement. The stereotype being attacked is now the "gang-bangers", those from "the hood". Not all black people... Just most of them.

From the 60s-70s, black people living in near industrial zones where they mostly worked were hit by mass unemployment due to their relocation. Rather than try to find a solution, propaganda stigmatising them was massively produced, the "war on drugs" was started to punish them for the only survival means that some found. Black people serve disproportionately long sentences, and are forever alienated when they get out, often unable to find jobs. Not only those who were imprisoned, but their families and communities suffer from this. This is not only true of drug-related crime; but sometimes things like misfiled taxes. The war on drugs was basically a pretext to over police and arbitrarily arrest black people, and dissuade them from forms of protest against their situation.

Now, compared to segregation, this is as big a net, but not such a tight one: This systems allows some black people to escape this system and get a situation equal to white people... But of you look at the bulk of the stats, many aren't better off than during segregation.

These were at first, right-wing policies bore by the Republican Party, but Bill Clinton ended up doubling down on them instead of opposing them, because he didn't want to appear "weak on crime", since then there has been no opposition to it in mainstream politics.

Colorblindness helps this system, because it keeps you from naming the oppressed group, and thus from seing the oppression. It makes it easier to swallow the idea that the millions in prison are no-good gang hooligans from the mysterious land of "hood", but that for the most part, black people are doing fine, because those who went to the same school as you or are among your coworkers are doing fine.

"Bad" I can't say, you took no risk, and thus made no mistakes, but also displayed little skills.

Using triangles for the bodies is a good idea, as triangles are a good shape, you can do anything with triangles. Have you consider increasing the amount of triangle, as such?

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

I dropped the round heads in the last one, because honestly, circles are an overrated shape. And you can do anything in triangles, why use anything else?

You can find any number of foolish ressources online, none of them tells you the truth about triangles. All sorts of websites and yet more websites try to teach you how to draw, without even mentioning triangles in any of their tutorials.

Short for Ludovici Giovanni.

Flynn apparently doesn't work or perform any regular household tasks. This doesn't seem to be the case of Roonie ("It sounds pretty good" , Roonie doesn't know for sure whether or not it is pretty good, thus mustn't be living this life).

Roonie does Everything, Flynn has three meals a day and a place to sleep and yet complains that there's nothing to do? That doesn't sound fair.

I tend to think of Valentine's day as the hum of a fridge: Easy to ignore until brought to my attention, and soon forgotten afterwards.

Good on Signal, but what's the problem with Telegram?

Both Telegram and Signal are decent, tho they require a phone number to sign up and are more similar to WhatsApp. Then there's Matrix, but it's like the fediverse, you must find or create and instance, they might find it complicated. Same for IRC.