I’m old enough to remember the hard drive shortages.
henfredemars
joined 2 years ago
They literally don’t care if people buy them or not. Overwhelmingly profit is in the server and enterprise areas now.
Some people will still buy at those high prices and they are more than happy to stick with that small slice.
No wonder Nvidia is the world’s most valuable company.
We know. Problem is, a third of us thinks the solution is killing the other third and the rest can't be bothered. As the famous saying goes.
And so we have learned; he is indeed incompetent and unfit, and America has decided that fealty to the bitter end is most important value.
I think the obvious and blatant dementia is a dead giveaway. It's incredibly sad that we'd even consider having such a person well into decline in a position of leadership. He should be in a home receiving compassionate end-of-life care.
Can the universe not also approximate? Why must it be an exact result whenever a rule is applied?
I take issue with completeness in a very similar way. For example, imagine for some reason that in the simulation it’s impossible to think about penguins. Let’s say that penguins are so logically incomprehensible that we cannot implement this.
The implementation of the simulation could simply trap any attempt to think about penguins and replace it with something else. We would be none the wiser. The simulation still works even if there are states that we can’t get to or are undefined.
It could be that reality itself isn’t entirely complete and defined everywhere. Who’s to say this isn’t one big dream and that the sky isn’t there if we all stopped looking?
There is no escape from Plato‘s cave.
Dr. Faizal says the same limitation applies to physics. “We have demonstrated that it is impossible to describe all aspects of physical reality using a computational theory of quantum gravity,” he explains.
“Therefore, no physically complete and consistent theory of everything can be derived from computation alone.”
Your argument is bad and you should feel bad.
Impossible to describe does not mean that it’s not possible to simulate, and impossible is an incredibly strong criterion that sounds quite inaccurate to me. We simulate weather systems all the time, even though the systems are fundamentally chaotic and it’s impossible to forecast accurately. We don’t even know that gravity is quantum, so that’s quite a weird starting point but we’ll ignore that for a second. What is this argument?
This seems like a huge leap to conclude that just because some aspects of our understanding seem like we wouldn’t be able to fully describe them somehow means that the universe can’t be simulated.
“Drawing on mathematical theorems related to incompleteness and indefinability, we demonstrate that a fully consistent and complete description of reality cannot be achieved through computation alone,” says Dr. Faizal.
Who’s to say that reality is completely defined? Perhaps there are aspects to what we consider the real universe that are uncertain. Isn’t that foundational to quantum mechanics?
The expression is really good.
He better act quickly. The legal system is just about completely collapsed at this point. He may not get the opportunity at all later.
It works by asking your system for a small computation before handling the request. It’s not too intrusive for normal users, but it drives up the costs for bot farms.