ech

Wet the tip.

He's gonna fucking invade, isn't he?

Your initial "point" was just to insult them. You called them a moron. Nobody's going to engage with that as if it's reasonable.

You'll see the same communities/magazine no matter what's the instance you use.

Important caveat that, while all instances have equal access to all communities (barring defedaration), communities won't show up for instance users until at least one user has subscribed to it. Some instances use bots to automatically federate new communities, but it's not a guarantee. That said, World will likely have the most comprehensive access to other communities given the size of its active user base.

Don't hold out on us! Which browsers?

It's hilarious the you're simultaneously (and incorrectly) claiming "movies these days" are too PC for this, and yet the "edgiest" comedians you can come up with are a group of middle-aged dad's doing the most pg "pranks" ever.

It's pretty telling to focus on the dev's right to reject inclusivity while simultaneously rejecting and deriding everyone else's right to judge them for that.

And if it was such a useless change, why didn't the dev reject it for that instead of saying it was "political"? He's the one that declared the word itself, not the utility of the change, was the problem. Calling everyone else "trolls" for pointing that out is just disingenuous.

They refused to use the right pronoun. One is a mistake. The other is a choice.

Perhaps this is what you mean, but it's even worse than just unpaid hours for current employees. His implicit goal is to generate a slave-class of people (which is what actual AI would be) that he can make more of or delete at his whim, and eliminate to livelihoods of any current employees (besides him and other execs, of course).

People don't need to know how to write a program from scratch to have useful tech knowledge. Knowing basic keyboard shortcuts puts a person above the vast majority of other people in terms of tech literacy.

I still don't read it that way, but assuming it is, that is still unreasonable. There are simply too many differing viewpoints, by design. The best option for this sort of thing is to start a female focused instance. It won't be able to affect the wider fediverse directly, but it would be able provide the space that is seemingly absent atm.

The admins of what? There is no singular "admins" of the Fediverse. That's kind of the whole point.