Not yet, but it's an interesting thought experiment if nothing else. Someday, thanks to advances in robotics and computers, human labor will become largely obsolete. So the question is how do we structure our society when that happens?
cattywampas
joined 4 months ago
But if you believe that other people believe something has value, then you also believe it has value. You wouldn't accept money for something if you believed it had no value.
The egg came first. Mutations happen in the production of gametes, or sex cells, so a proto-chicken would have produced a slightly mutated egg that turned out to be a chicken.
You can have conversations IRL that nobody will monitor or have any record of. I swear, people these days have forgotten how to exist in the real world.
I wouldn't call moderated internet communities a panopticon. You can opt out at any time, which is pretty antithetical to the definition of a panopticon.
What's the better way?
No, dogs have no concept of gender identity.
Hit the gym, stop eating so many sweets.
The Romans didn't use base 12. Roman numerals aren't a positional system.
I've never heard of crossing your fingers like that to indicate 10.
But labor is a necessity to survive, and always has been. We need the production of goods and services. Of course the distribution of wealth and goods is also an issue, but somebody (or something) has to produce the things we use.