this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
-2 points (0.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

35168 readers
495 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yes, I know, trolls etc. But such action turns any conversation into a bad joke. And anybody who trusts a moderator is a fool.

Find a better way.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Find a better way

Mind explaining what would possibly be better? Having zero moderation isn't it. And if you say AI, I'mma smack you upside the head.

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

What would be better is a system where the sanctity of the conversation was respected. Where there was 100% assurance that everything you said got to me and everything I said got to you. No question at all. No man in the middle censoring and altering according to his whim.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

Sounds like you want a private messenger, not a public forum...

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People have been asking you for days with zero explanation: what the fuck happened to you here to make you go on this weird pseudo-crusade?

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago

I literally just explained.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

the thing youre missing about the fediverse.. if a community does not approve of a mod they can literally pick up and move their community to a new community or even a different instance altogether.

this has happened at least a few times.

moderation is a necessary management tool, and yes, it is certainly abused.. but the fediverse gives us the ability to tell mods to go fuck themselves.

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Necessary? That is a large statement.

What leads you to say that it's necessary?

[–] superkret@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The fact that unmoderated places attract pedophiles sharing pictures, Spambots, and trolls.
Go take a look at a random board on 8kun if you don't believe me.
It's largely unmoderated, you'll love it!!!

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

There are other ways to control the conversation. Ones that do not require a moderator. For example, voting.

So not necessary.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure the police will agree when they find child abuse videos on the instance server's HDD.

"No don't arrest me, the child porn was DOWNVOTED!!"

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Imagine a form of downvoting that led to removal from the server.

Decree of the masses vs decree of authority . Still gets the job done.

You do mean like this very comment, right now?

collapsed inline media

IDK... Careful what you wish for?
The irony of saying this, while also benefiting from humans' leeway is kinda rich, just saying.

[–] cattywampas@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The better way is one where control resides solely with the user.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That's embarrassingly ignorant.

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As a user, you can:

  • Review instance and community rules prior to participating
  • Review the moderator logs to confirm that moderation activities have been in line with the rules
  • If you notice a discrepancy, e.g., over-moderation, you can hold the mods accountable and draw attention to it or simply choose not to engage in that instance or community
  • Host your own instance
  • Create communities in an existing instance or your own instance

If you host your own instance and communities within that instance, then at that point, you have full control, right? Other instances can de-federate from yours.

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I am aware of that. But still, giving somebody the power to arbitrarily censor and modify our conversation is a fundamentally bad thing.

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Then why are you doing that, and why aren’t you at least hosting your own instance?

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago

It's a discussion of principle.

This is a foreign concept?

[–] superkret@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The instance admin is legally responsible for everything posted on their instance.
Giving all the control to the users would literally carry the risk of going to prison.

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago

That doesn't make having a moderator any less bad

[–] Letme@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You don't have to participate at all, you realize that right?

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago

It's a discussion of principle.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"We don't need moderators!" shouts the Troll*, in the wrong community.

* either a troll or just an idiot, doesn't matter imo

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago

If you are saying nothing wrong then you have nothing to fear from moderation, right?

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A mod MAKES the community and makes the rules of that community.

Kinda like how you wouldn't want me to go to your and take a shit on the carpet.

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Surely the constituancy of users have some hand in making the community too.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, and one single "user" with a script can destroy it if no one is moderating.

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago

I don't see the connection with my reply

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I run !news_summary@hilariouschaos.com I don't remove shit unless u are clearly violating the rules its all available via the modlog.

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

its all available via the modlog

[–] Blaze@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Mods who power trip get reported to !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Not perfect, but that and public modlogs help

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago

It's weird. The simple fact of being watched and told what you can say. And the possibility that what you're saying is being edited and what you're hearing is edited too.

This strikes me as abhorrent. But most of the people here call it necessary, preferable and even desirable.

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I know, trolls etc. But such action turns any conversation into a bad joke. And anybody who trusts a moderator is a fool.

Not just trolls - there’s much worse content out there, some of which can get you sent to jail in most (all?) jurisdictions.

And even ignoring that, many users like their communities to remain focused on a given topic. Moderation allows this to happen without requiring a vetting process prior to posting. Maybe you don’t want that, but most users do.

Find a better way.

Here’s an option: you can code a fork or client that automatically parses the modlog, finds comments and posts that have been removed, and makes them visible in your feed. You could even implement the ability to reply by hosting replies on a different instance or community.

For you and anyone who uses your fork, it’ll be as though they were never removed.

Do you have issues with the above approach?

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago

This is a discussion of principle. Save the details till later.