Straight leg and baggy jeans with big pockets are plenty available for women.
cattywampas
joined 3 months ago
A roasted chicken. Usually we eat the dark meat for dinner, use the white meat for other meals over the next couple days, and then I use the carcass for stock. Root vegetables underneath the bird while it cooks to get them nice and schmaltzy.
Do you expect companies to never lay anyone off?
Bet you a nickel this bill won't even make it out of committee.
Not according to me, I've had a pretty good track record of predicting what will and won't happen with this administration.
Cash and gift cards are the absolute worst things to receive.
I have a hard time believing that the average breast size in America is DD.
Lol this bill will never pass, and there's still plenty of NSFW content available on Lemmy.
Having a job and feeling useful is in no way exclusive to capitalism.
Go live in the woods and homestead with my family.
Definitely Chicago. We're a very queer-friendly city!
It is true. Women's pants with big pockets are freely available, just do a Google shopping search and you'll see. American Eagle, Gap, Abercrombie, Forever 21, Old Navy, H&M, Ann Taylor, Dickies, Patagonia, Levi's, and the list goes on. All these retailers sell baggy and loose pants with big pockets.
Also worth noting, Y2K fashion is very in with younger people and you'll see them wearing a lot of baggy pants, I'm talking JNCO baggy.
So why aren't big-pocketed pants the standard in women's fashion? It's simple: women tend to want slimmer pants. It's just a consumer decision.