WinGirl99

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

I am sad that i was wrong with jaPenis here is an image about to represent how i feel

collapsed inline media

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

yup commented the details below.

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I mean it is better than not coding at all.

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

ichi ni san yon go rokku nana hachi kyuu juu

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Nice answer and i do really appreciate your answer thanks for your hard work to write it it.

"Human nature" is just a short way of referring to the complex subject of certain behaviors present in some individuals and how they interact with human group dynamics, similarly to how "Theory of Evolution" is a short way of referring to the complex subject of how genetic traits that provide small advantages with reproductive success consequences can through time and the law of large number spread to alter an entire population or even create new species. In fact both those things are correlated.

Evolution has scientific articles behind it. Do you have scientific articles behind your "human nature" claims. Its science's job to analyse "nature". If such phenomena existed there would be articles about it. Please send it.

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Interesting take. But there is some truth to the notion of 'human nature'. Humans do act certain ways; we retract from pain, we attempt to solve problems and communicate.

Yes but these are psychological behaviours of humans. Psychology as it is name suggest psycho-logia is a scientific branch. One must speak about that "human nature" if they have scientific data. And instantly that would not be human nature at all because scientific researches have titles like "the change of bird population in cyprus in tha last 50 years" and not "bird nature"\

Whether it is 'human nature' that dictatorship power corrupts people can only be inferred by the examples we have seen. If you can show that a dictatorship didn't lead to abuse of power in some significant number of cases, then it would be proven false.\

It is a generalization not a fact. You cant build up your argument on a generalization and say that it is "human nature". As if humans have evolved by a scientifically approved fact that to do that. While i agree on power corrupts i have awareness of that "if we give one person all the power the probability of it will ruin them is very high. Very bold of someone to label something as "natural".

I am okay with going "statics show that humans are tend to do xyz" I am not okay just saying "human nature"

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 11 hours ago

ah yes the good old caste system that makes you post normieslop on your karma farm subreddits.

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

go back to school

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 22 hours ago

oh btw i am an anarchist. Anarchy also is not well with "human nature". So dont think I am a Marxist-leninist and defending them. I just...

...hate that word.

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

Your opinion does not matter, I am not saying this because you are invalid. I am saying this because this is not the thing i wanna talk with you.

"human nature" these two words mean nothing and even more than being meaningless these two words are harmful. What human nature? Are there any scientific proofs that something is "human nature". It has no logic behind yet it is accepted by you and excepted to accept by the reader.

There is no such thing as human nature. Human nature is when you have two hands. Human nature is not when "if someone gains power the power corrupts the powerholder." there is a chance that it may not occour. It is not certain. the situation of that "human nature" is not very specified. thats why it has no meaning behind it.

The second i wanna point is that the "human nature" is always used against communism. Communism is not well with human nature. okay, sure. What about capitalism. you are either capitalist or communist. You want either private property exist or not. capitalism harms people so it is not very well with human nature either. Power also corrupts in capitalism. Elon Musk is the dictionary defination of power corrupts.

If power corrupts then under capitalism it also is power corrupts if human nature is not well with communism same goes with capitalism.

It is not just you that say this human nature. It is nothing personal. I really do hate that fallacy.

[–] WinGirl99@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 22 hours ago

I use mastodon.social and i have nearly 300 followers here. I dont know any server nor i do know how to find one that match with my interests. I am interested in generally anime, visual novel, jpop, art lgbt etc. twitter is one central website that servs all kind of people at once so it is not very quiet. mastodon.social is both quiet and I am having struggles to find someone famous and interesting entertaining here. Like bro on my feed posting something and gets zero likes. I do the same and the same happens to me.

as rumba@lemmy.zip also states that the inactivity here is a major problem i also did the same my account here is from 2023 and we are about to enter 2026. I am also a dead account here.

view more: next ›