Maybe he's just Pichai is just really smart and trying to get the breaks slammed on the AI bubble before it pops.
Listen if this works the way you think it does, half the country is going to be out of work. CEO: but our company will make a lot of money right, someone else is going to do it eventually anyway.
OK, look if this works the way it is supposed to, we won't need you anymore!
Oh shit, hit the breaks, no more AI, it's all a bubble anyway.
Very true, though with windows automatically updating to new versions and forcing upgrades, IMO the time to do it is when they would otherwise be forced to make a full version change anyway, as the differences between 10 and 11, are probably more than a windows 10 themed linux.
Unfortunately they kind of are... it's kind of the insanity of the system we live in... their car sales are down everywhere, but they are making more from government contracts and AI speculation.
Which yeah was part of why my added exception was if the military is going to buy a shit ton of toyotas. Government perks have ot outweigh loss in sales
I did mess that up, did mean early 2016, or even early 2024.
Wow, he's really not reading the country very well is he? 2020, that was a 50/50 move, piss off half the country, earn the support from half of it. (again just talking on a purely business strategy), unless the millitary is about to buy a shitload of toyota's, I don't see how this isn't a horrific play.
I mean, even giving her all the credit humanly possible to someone who's acted insanely crazy for as long as she's been in politics. I don't believe she's said anything to even imply trump is in them. Only that he's seemingly opposed to releasing them, and that clearly some powerful men don't want them released.
Agreed there too, there probably could never be a large enough pool of safely organized data to actually make a child safe chat gpt. But yeah kind of the key issue I agree with.
also agreed on the inevitable implosion of generative AI. I think we're basically hitting moores law on it where there isn't enough data to even remotely train it much further than it is, and the mass output of AI data now, is we'll certainly be very soon hitting extreme repercussions of "incestuous data". (IE the internet is getting flooded with AI slop, AI models are searching the internet, won't be long before the copy of copy of copy problems lead to everything going backwards).
So yeah, agreed AI was always bullshit day 1. The greatest flaw was releasing it to the public in it's infancy, and it's very early on super impressive demos in a form that your average boomer accountant could see it and go "that's amazing"
I'm not doubting the problems of any government. however to make the case that it's not grounded on the fear of communism... It's not like that's exactly uncommon in countries we are continuing to do business like NBD, Isreal, Russia, Saudi Arabia to name a few off the top of my head.
Again not disagreeing with the general concept that communist countries aren't exempt from committing atrocities. Difference is a capitalist country does them "it's a growing pain", or "they are starting out, once they get big enough they'll fix it, just like the US did".
Yeah to me that's the biggest objection... he's long dead, he has no surviving family that wants good for him to my knowledge. So to me that's kind of on the same level as, digging up mummies. The evil actions he commited in life don't really come into play here, and agreed it's really stupid idea to think that his behavior is genetic.
Kind of reminds me of when most of the nazi generals swore to have no kids to not carry on their DNA, except one, who said "No I won't sign that pledge, that's eugenics which is nazi ideology".
I mean yeah, there's no question that extremist rhetoric got him killed. and yeah I'd have to say it's far more of his own style of it. The part that baffles me is how it's only 60%, unless they somehow posed it as rhetoric against him. To me that question is as basic as saying "did gun violence have anything to do with his death?", uhh yeah.
I have feeling the question is vaguely worded so that they can then try and tear it to say "is it people saying he supports facism the reason for the violence". So that they can push to criminalize describing reality and pointing out real problems, because some people might try to solve problems with violence.
Who the hell is thinking of these concepts. News has been running on chatgpt giving dangerous hallucinations, suicide instructions, mimicking love and attachment.
In short the only way to wind up with an LLM that's probably safe for kids, would be to start training from zero. Give it absolutely no exposure to anything that wasn't curated from the start... say the initial data set being a catalog of mr rogers and seseme street scripts. Starting from "everything on the internet" and then trying to restrict down is a fools erend. That's like trying to make a porn blocker with a blacklist strategy.
Honestly I don't get how AI isn't rolling backwards already. Image sites are burried in AI slop. Social media posts are burried in AI slop, and now e-mails, that were probably written by AIs. How is AI even remotely improving right now, when obviously 90% of any new training data it's getting, was generated by the last generation of AI.