Chakravanti

joined 7 months ago
[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 0 points 3 months ago

Especially while I'm...wait....uh...never mind.

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 2 points 3 months ago

Kind of like when a shitty joker begs the king for food because he's hungry but the other way around.

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah, I'd say that would easily happen but it's kind of a racing problem here isn't it?

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 2 points 3 months ago

You can make Pi sized shoes and make them and I'm sure it will happen without doubt. Make those fuckers 4E and fucking no. No, you'll fucking never do that. Spits on the ground.

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Most people can't handle the Clown.

I handle the Clown like a priest. Be careful of what the priest says. It may completely disfigure that of the not-fully-developed such. Here's the real kicker. None of you can be unless you accept that as a fact.

To iterate further, in a true invokation, science is an art of language. Not far from "religion" to say so. In one invokation, it is the picture we can reproduce based on the image it depicts into understanding of reality.

To make the other, I'd like to reference Joao Magueijo's Faster than the Speed of Light book. This book demonstrates how we can both be right and wrong in an alternative perspective of what is real.

This, like, "The Big Bang" theory is some kind of similar notion to the Speed of Light the way he is sort of correcting but sort of saying that's right in the same painting he is writing.

Of course its right. Of course its wrong. I'll do that in a simple few paragraphs.

What happens when a black hole is large enough to make the wavelength it generates out large enough to be matter?

That's a big bang. It'll probably eat more matter than is in our current visible 'verse to capitualate such a scenario but the visibility of our 'verse doesn't make the end of it. There are more "Big Bangs" than there are visible stars in any and every method we may percieve such. In fact, I can articulate that there are infinate such "Big Bangs".

Prove me wrong.

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Depends on the meaning of the invokation of the word "science."

To iterate that, in some such, you are correct. In others, six one way half a dozen the other.

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So...basically science don't know shit but can't stop speaking like it does.

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 0 points 3 months ago (6 children)

You're the clown.

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 1 points 3 months ago

I ain't touching anything MZ. I don't really care about money beyond what it says about the subject in hand but either way...

I'm paranoid by practice. I do not and should not need a reason. I personally engage in paranoia for the development of the skill. I did this way back in the day when everyone thought the act generating "fear" of "spying" was undoable anyway by "them." Now, today, you're either entirely ignorant or you know it's probably doing "observation" you don't even know about yet.

So control what they can see best or else you're just an NPC.

view more: ‹ prev next ›