TL;DR The most prominent correlation is between pedophilia and CSA victimhood. Survivors are more likely to develop pedophilic tendencies themselves, though most still don't.
Allero
joined 2 years ago
Absolutely. Bring justice to chomos!
There's actually more to it!
Popular culture tends to equate the terms "pedophile" and "child molester", even though most pedophiles never sexually abuse any children, and not all child molesters are driven by pedophilia.
By spreading the hate for all pedophiles, not only do we spread hate for people that never chose to be like that, we also contribute to their social isolation and inability to gain professional help, while at the same time reinforcing the "pedophile = predator" pattern.
Therapy for pedophilia is available, and it works. We need nonjudgmental ways to direct such people to get help, not panic and outcry.
Unfortunately, no, we can't. Pedophilia appears fairly randomly, and there are many factors of risk, of which genetics has not been indicated.
The good news is, pedophile does not equal child molester! Most pedophiles never abuse children, and by expanding anonymous therapy options, we can ensure even less of them cross the line.
And hey, cryptocurrency also has utility outside speculative markets and grifters!
It can be used to move money freely and often times more efficiently, and some of it can be used for private payments, too. Ability to financially support someone anonymously is important for democracy.
It also allows you to get money directly without revealing sensitive payment information or relying on third party with giant fees. This is objectively good!
Test successful!
For people to RTFM, you need clear and concise manuals for different groups of users.
It's no use addressing most IT-related manuals without prerequisite knowledge and practical experience.
If it's an instruction to a dishwasher liquid, you better write it for first-graders.
Sure, if you write a documentation to some developer tools, use developer language.
But if it's something you expect regular folk to use, think of how much more people could use it if they wouldn't need to learn something entirely out of their field of expertise to use it.
You can make dishwashing liquid kit that would require extensive knowledge in organic chemistry to use. It would be cheap and darn simple to develop. You could release it today! You just...shouldn't.
Remember people have their lives, and shouldn't be forced to comprehend everything around them at a professional level. Many developers seem to forget about it A LOT somehow, shifting it to the user and saying "I'm done here", sitting in the bubble of experts and treating users like stupid rats who can't simply get a computer science degree to use their computer. As a food technologist, I recently developed a premix for home-baking of phenylalanine-free pastry, and 70% of the work was making it idiot-proof. It is true for any field, yet it is important. People can't learn everything every time they need something, and it's not their fault.
Galabrup, anyone?
Ah, fair enough
Who is the "few" in this context, if I may ask? Nonbinaries?
Damn I use the "obsessive compulsive" scheme and I really do have OCD
How do you know?!