this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
28 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44990 readers
665 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been in and out of therapy for most of my life, and I've always been under the assumption that therapy sessions are pretty much all confidential, bound by HIPAA, except for in a few circumstances like preventing harm to the client or others.

One of my family members is a family therapist and over the holidays she was sharing stories from her and her colleagues' clients. I was kind of put off by this but didn't want to start anything. None of the information made the clients identifiable, so I thought maybe this was the loophole but that still doesn't sound right to me. Is this normal?

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 24 points 9 hours ago

Doctors can share the details of your genial warts as well as long as it doesn't become painfully clear they were taking about you. The same logic applies to therapists. They can share your story but not the fact that it is yours. And if they have a lot of patients they have a certain level of obscurity. And if they're clever they change a couple of things about the story to make it less obvious.

The distinction I would make here is the intent behind sharing the story. If it's a function of venting with other professionals, I get it. They're only human too. If it's meant as a sort of teachable moment to others present, I think that's alright. If it's a "get a load of this shit" story telling and I found out, I would change therapists.

[–] sparkles@piefed.zip 11 points 8 hours ago

Not anything identifying, really. My best practice is to never talk about work with those outside of the need to know group. It goes in the work box, it stays there. Unless I had a particularly traumatic day. I couldn’t hide the limp or the black eye I had a few days ago. So that is an example of the most I will share.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 8 points 7 hours ago

They can share details, just not your details. And if the details they share reveal a connection to your identity, they fucked up

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I really don't know, but I've read several books by psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists where they shared client stories, without PII. I would think it's ok to share generic stories as long as the client can't be identified, only because I doubt from some of the stories I've read that all those clients consented to having their stories told, but who knows. Hopefully somebody with expertise can chime in!

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I have experience from the “proper handling of PII” side of things, and can tell you that while everyone covered by HIPAA has likely taken the mandatory PII training, most, if asked, wouldn’t be able to identify what is and isn’t protected from a list of examples.

So no matter what the rules say, medical and therapy data leak like a sieve, and modern expert systems, if provided with the information, could probably identify the patients 90% of the time.

What medical practitioners and therapists are really protected by is insurance.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

HIPAA also only covers specific types of information medium. It’s not a generic “you can’t share information” law like most people think it is, it’s a “if you’re storing information you need to follow these rules about who can see what, and have these safeguards in place to prevent access” law.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

I’d upvote you multiple times if I could.

And in some cases, they are actually required to share information with the government/police.

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

All medical journals and manuals where at some point someone's story, or an aggregation of multiple stories perhaps. What differentiates it is the connection to a person. It's plenty fine to talk in the abstract about cases for things like instruction or peer input, but only those that are a proper member of the care team, or are given specific disclosure access, should be able to attribute the discussion to an individual.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 3 hours ago

You need to give explicit permission to be included in many studies.

[–] pyrinix@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 13 seconds ago

They're allowed to only share bits of what they've heard by other clients if it relates to something you've told them. They're not allowed to explicitly detail names. That's what my therapist does.