this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
129 points (97.8% liked)

politics

26891 readers
2243 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/52351603

It was a wake-up call for America. In January, Donald Trump took the oath of office, declared himself “saved by God to make America great again” and issued a barrage of executive orders. In the ensuing months the US president and his allies moved at breakneck speed and seemed indomitable.

But as 2025 draws to a close with Trump struggling to stay awake at meetings, the prevailing image is of a driver asleep at the wheel. Opinion polls suggest that Americans are turning against him. Republicans are heading for the exit ahead of congressional contests next November that look bleak for the president’s party.

“He came into office and, like a blitzkrieg, was violating laws and the constitution,” said Larry Jacobs, director of the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance at the University of Minnesota. “The American political process is slow-moving and so he was able to do things that were extraordinary.

“But this is a guy whose legacy may well be the political collapse of Republicans in this era. Put another way, rather than asking who is going to be the inheritor of the Trump mantle and the so-called Maga movement, we may be talking in a year or so about which candidates can escape the odious distinction of having been connected with Trump.”

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't listen to the polls. Telling you Trump doesn't have a chance is a strategy his party uses to bring down voter turnout.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not just polls, there have been elections, they went badly for Republican candidates.

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

And what has changed since then?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, right, the Guardian is totally subservient to MAGA.

/s

Too bad Congress is powerless to do anything about an out of control President. Yup, 100% Trump's fault.

/s

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Just "unpopular"...

We're in for history repeating itself if we keep talking about Trump and the present moment like any of it is normal.

Nobody should forgive the Republicans until they've apologized for the damage they've enabled. There should be commitments to undo the damage. Of course it won't happen until MAGA is dead.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

That's not far enough. The Republican party should be disbanded for capitulating to Trump's authoritarianism. They've basically just abandoned their post to let a king in all but name run amok.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course it won’t happen until MAGA is dead.

Which will be never. Since "maga" == conservative, and it's not like these people are not creating new converts all the time, most especially among the very young and impressionable.

I've seen a lot of ink spilled about the gerontocracy, as if that's the source of our troubles. I see that "JD" "Vance" is a young 41 years old. As a for instance. Almost half the age of Taco. Taco being 79 is not the problem. Mitch McConnell, same thing. Or any other politician you care to point at that is at or over 80 or whatever people think is the cutoff. As long as conservatism keeps propagating itself, having even 20-something year olds in office is not going to fix jack shit.

I'm all for (former) Republicans and conservatives being made to atone for their sins before being welcomed back to polite society, though.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

and it’s not like these people are not creating new converts all the time, most especially among the very young and impressionable.

Here's hoping these broniverse manlets keep getting thumped on and the forthcoming generation realizes that "sigma" is just self-identifying as an insecure little pussy who doesn't stand a chance in a physical contest against someone who actually knows what they're doing. You can't spout misogynistic horseshit with your jaw wired shut.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Nobody should forgive the Republicans until they’ve apologized for the damage they’ve enabled.

I won't forgive them until 100% of them commit seppuku, or at least self-immolation.

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 1 points 47 minutes ago

Neither. But we can't have such nice things.

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 11 points 1 day ago

Don’t forget, kiddos, martial law in October. Get ready.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The DNC upon hearing this news decides to once again put the full force of their corporate-fellating power and contacts into supporting centrist, corporate candidates, thinking if they can get some of those nutter votes they'll be good. This will further alienate the people who actually want things to get better, and so more will decide to bow out of voting. And thus the window shifts further right, while seeming to shift a little left. A continuance of the grand political illusion.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

Is it an illusion or the reflection of a decaying empire?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Just wait until they get a load of just how disastrous his presidency - so far - has been for the economy.

The bullshit artists and those bothsiderist stooges have been propping up this notion that Biden left poor Donvict a terrible economy and Donvict has been working so hard to "fix" it.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

"Bracing" is an odd way of saying "working harder at election fuckery to prevent a midterm trouncing."

You can be sure there will be even more anomalous results than last time. And you can be equally sure that the media will talk about "unexpected swings" rather than considering the possibility that proven fraudsters and criminals might have rigged the election.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I hate the term "cope", but there honestly is no better way to describe this article.

From my experience living in the US, a significant portion of the local population (be it far right or centre right) are generally supportive of crime and corruption. The centre right opposition is incapable of any meaningful action on crime and they are too involved in local corruption schemes to change. And a significant portion of the centre-right electorate also support crime. Not saying it was always like that or it can't change; this is a mere (extremely subjective) evaluation of the current situation.

From the perspective of people in other countries (that support democracy, efficient governance, innovation), it is reasonable to assume that Americans cannot be relied upon in any substantive manner irrespective of whether the far right or centre right is in power; at least for the next 30-50 years. Much of their civil society and civil service (that was world class at one point) is completely debased and have been replaced by local criminals and regressives.

It is reasonable to assume this is not going to change any time soon. Instead we'll have usual pompous bullshit.

To quote Barack Obama:

“You know, don’t tell me you’re a Democrat, but you’re kind of disappointed right now, so you’re not doing anything. No, now is exactly the time that you get in there and do something,” he said. “Don’t say that you care deeply about free speech and then you’re quiet. No, you stand up for free speech when it’s hard. When somebody says something that you don’t like, but you still say, ‘You know what, that person has the right to speak.’ … What’s needed now is courage.”

What's needed now is courage?

What the fuck does this even mean?

Not to mention the tedious polemics about free speech.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 23 hours ago

For someone who talked about the need for speech and courage, Obama sure has spent a lot of time out of the public eye not using his speech and not being courageous.

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Hopefully, the trouncing republicans receive will be behind bars.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The media is already shaping the narrative. Assuming there is an election, stories like this will encourage people to sit it out. Then, "Red Wave!" "It's a MIRACLE!"

So get your ass in gear and get the vote out. This may be our last worst chance.

Remember everyone: If you think the Republicans are about to get a trouncing, get a couple of your own punches in to make sure it's a thorough one.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Pfft. The sitouts would absolutely let the literal devil into office, if the other candidate ruffled their feathers in any way.