this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
123 points (97.7% liked)

Europe

6311 readers
1011 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 100 points 2 months ago (3 children)

But he also indicated that he wanted the EU to reduce its standards to allow more U.S. goods to enter its market, referring to safety measures as "non-monetary tariffs."

"It's tariffs where they put things on where they make it impossible for you to sell a car ... they make it so difficult, the standards and the tests," Trump said. "They come up with rules and regulations that are just designed for one reason: that you can't sell your product in those countries. And we're not gonna let that happen. Those are called non-monetary barriers."

Keep your pedestrian hazards like the cybertruck in your country. We already have enough people driving unnecessarily huge cars. We need less and smaller cars.

[–] BigShammy80@feddit.org 55 points 2 months ago

This just shows that the tests and regulations work 😁 We don't need shitty american cars...

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 17 points 2 months ago

Lol He whines about our high standards as an entry barrier. If that's true, then why are there so many apple devices purchased here?

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Aren't you worried you might starve if your vehicle isn't tall enough to reach the drive-through window? Also, how are you going to transport landscaping supplies for your massive lawn? Furthermore, there's so many big vehicles on the road. I'd be concerned they would bully me if I were in a smaller car.

[–] BigShammy80@feddit.org 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, i specifically chose a small car for city traffic. You don't have parking lots as big as whole football fields here in germany 😅😅 I once saw a parking map for a sea world somewhere in USA... this shit is unreal!!

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] BigShammy80@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, this is exactly the picture i was talking about 😮

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

What're we supposed to do? The busses only come on the hour if there's coverage for a region at all. It's really frustrating to see our taxes go to such poor service, so we very reasonably try to teach them a lesson by having our politicians reduce their funding, but they don't learn at all. The service just gets worse until a charitable, for-profit corporation steps in to fill the vacuum, usually with car-oriented services. What would we do without massive tarmacs stretching for miles?

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 73 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sorry we don't negotiate with terrorists

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If it's not from the brown-people region, it's not really terrorism. It's just sparkling freedom fighting.

[–] gigachad@sh.itjust.works 70 points 2 months ago (9 children)

The ridiculous thing is, digital earnings like the billions from Meta, Google etc. are not getting counted into the trade by Americans. Wonder how the trade deficit would look like if we did that. Apart from that, nobody wants to buy your ugly cars here, they wouldn't even fit to our streets. It's not like you couldn't produce something for the European market, if you wanted. Nobody is interested in something like the Ford F150

[–] BigShammy80@feddit.org 26 points 2 months ago

Exactly... they earn billions with their tech stuff from us... It's time to reduce that a little too! Use European services where you can and boycott Meta, Google etc

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

I think they had a hard enough time explaining “goods” to him. They need that to sink in before introducing “services". He is still amused with the old-fashioned word “groceries“

…JFC we are doomed

There are a few of those pickup trucks around here. If they were easier to get in Germany I believe more fragile men would buy it. Even if it just sits in the driveway.

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 months ago

I have already seen too many of those things in my city. But it is fun to watch them looking for a space to park their emotional support vehicles.

[–] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I doubt that thing would even fit in my drive.

[–] steiner@nrw.social 5 points 2 months ago

@gigachad @CAVOK oh don't give the orange boy ideas, next headline will be "they ripp us off, EU must bring 90% of their citizens to truth network (or how ever his daily shitpost site is called) to get tariff relief!" 🤣 I hope EU does it like china, we can survive a view month longer with that than america.

[–] jrs100000@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Doesnt Meta collect its money in Ireland?

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

If services are included, we're almost even.

[–] TBi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Given the amount of new giant pick ups around Ireland, I wouldn’t be surprised if the F150 is popular here.

[–] the_wiz@feddit.org 50 points 2 months ago

Well, I sincerely hope the EUs answer to it will be "get lost". We should not, we can not let us extort by a wannabe Mafia boss.

[–] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 49 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Best I can do is to boycott all US products.

[–] the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago

I'm doing my part too 🫡

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

As an American my advise is for Europe to give Trump the middle finger and let it all fall apart. I don't want our country to die ugly, and I sure as hell never voted for it. But if our hardship leads to the downfall of the Orange Jackass and his whole damned cult, then so be it. With any luck that'll happen before I end up disappeared or thrown into one of Roadkill Kennedy's internment camps for people who take SSRIs.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago

I recognize that this comes from a place of extraordinary privilege, and I hope you do too...but I kinda agree. Let's just get the collapse of the US over with so we can rebuild. Quit dragging our feet on it, it's just gonna make things worse in the long term.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Its a sacrifice we're willing to make.

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Please, European countries, and even China for that fact, please don't give in. Make tRump eat shit for this stupid bully tactic. He's turned the US into the kiddie table all the parents ignore.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

I'm a visual thinker, trump eating shit might be my best visual thought of today.

[–] aldfin@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago
[–] aleq@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Surely there is zero political support for this in Europe. Of course we're hurting badly from the tariffs, but at least in my circle I don't see anyone supporting bending over to any demand he sends us.

Almost as soon as Trump was reelected, von der Leyen suggested opening negotiations to buy more American liquefied natural gas (LNG). But POLITICO reported that the U.S. had, in response, offered no clarity about how a deal would work.

Don't quite follow this though, does the EU need more fossil fuels? Aren't we moving away from it? Is this aimed at replacing russian natural gas?

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean we do still import Russian oil and gas that could be replaced this way. Still, this is not about what the EU needs, it's a proactive offering of protection money. They forgot that Trump needs it to have been his pressure that made us bend the knee, not our own initiative, otherwise he won't look strong.

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We are? I was under the impression that this had stopped, and that we now only do so indirectly in ways that are difficult to track (e.g. India importing raw materials from Russia, refining and shipping it to Europe).

Fully agree with your analysis that most of this is about Trumps ego and an attempt at asserting power.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

I was under the impression that this had stopped

Nope.

[–] NotNow@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Send in the clowns!

[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago

The U.S. isn't committing to closing the trade deficit in services, showing that Trump's tariffs are just about American dominance, not 'fairness'.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How much is that in solar and wind power?

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

IDK, I imagine the US is lagging behind China in that, especially now, if we're looking at foreign imports.

[–] zeezee@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

wtf - the EU imported 15-20b on LNG in 2024 - how does it make any sense to increase LNG imports by 15-20 times while claiming to decarbonize? Or is the plan to just weave the 350B debt and then be left holding the proverbial LNG bag?

collapsed inline media

And this comes after: "Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič is hoping his U.S. counterparts can settle on a “term sheet” that sets out a framework for talks — when the next round of tariffs takes effect."

These could entail lowering duties, investing in American defense firms, boosting purchases of U.S. liquefied natural gas, or softening some regulations. ^1^

Soo the EU is going for the classic get fucked in the ass, suck the cum out while you’re belching, burp, belch, and go back for a second helping...

collapsed inline media

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

how does it make any sense to increase LNG imports by 15-20 times while claiming to decarbonize?

You mean from EU side? I don't think Trump cares about decarbonization or EU efforts regarding it.

[–] zeezee@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago

yep, Europe really ought to not cave into the demand to buy up more LNG and instead focus on developing their own renewable energy base instead