this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
213 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

78024 readers
3240 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Just watched a "Feynman" video on Youtube I thought was a little off. Especially when one of the examples simply seemed outright wrong.
But I thought it was probably me who misunderstood something. Until I read the description, and it turned out his voice was recreated by AI, and the "lecture" was designed by an unknown person to be in the "spirit" of Feynman!

It had Feynman's name all over it, and then in the description they end it with:

No impersonation is intended

When they had his name all over it, and the title claims it's a lecture by Feynman which it absolutely wasn't, and they use AI to simulate his voice!! How is that not impersonating? That shit should be outright illegal, it is fraud, Feynman had nothing to do with the content, and it even had mistakes!

Unfortunately on Youtube I can't find a way to block a channel after having seen the video. That option seems to only be available on my start page for the suggested videos on that page.
I have blocked hundreds of AI crap channels, and they keep popping up.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just stop watching Youtube entirely except for channels you specifically want. The entire thing is a slop platform.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 19 hours ago

google/youtube likes to produce slop, since thier whole business now is including AI into everything.

[–] morto@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

And make sure to block ads when viewing it

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

I wish Youtube operated like a PiHole where you could upload a list of channels and block them all in one fell swoop.

[–] cevn@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

I just saw one of these too. RIP YouTube.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Slop videos have clogged the recommendations on youtube since well before the AI era. Top 10 clickbait videos with text to speech narration...

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I tried watching what was supposed to be a video comparing several linux distros. Instead, it was AI text to speech narrating over random images. Are people uploading this crap in an attempt to get a share of ad revenue, or just to be awful? I have to hope Youtube doesn't let this be fully automated, so people are doing this on purpose...

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It was already fully automated years ago, with the bullshit oriented at small kids. It was multibillion endeavour even then, YouTube did nothing to it, why would they, it's their dream business model. The one now, when bots generate slop that is watched by other bots, is just a continuation of that

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

YouTube did nothing to it, why would they, it’s their dream business model.

They could still cut the crap without change in revenue. People would just click on other videos and ads, instead of AI Slop.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

They are a monopoly. They don't care and they don't have any financial incentives to care. Making good platform that people want to use is hard, making it a monopoly and populate it with slop that other bots are clicking through way easier, and brings basically the same results. People who don't want to click on slop will continue to do so, but now they're spending more time looking for it, which is even better for ad revenue. What else are they gonna do, watch Vimeo? Go outside? Don't be ridiculous.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 18 hours ago

theres alot of that with mcu/dcaeu type videos, its so obvious when they mis-pronounce names too.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Don't see the slop because I only use subscriptions feed.

[–] Lonewolfmcquade@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

To expand on this, I have witnessed small, indie channels have their content copied, processed through AI so it is stripped of audio, watermarks and re-edited. Then it is posted as a new video. When it is reported as a fake, or pirated copy, or not original content, Google then puts the burden of proof on the small indie channel that originally created the content, often requiring them to lawyer up and file a legal complaint, before they will take any action to remove the AI slop. It is fucking absurd. It would only take a real person about 60 seconds to compare the content and dates to determine who is the theif.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The other 70% are non-AI brainrot videos. 1% has any value.

[–] oplkill@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

This. AI just boosted it, it was always like that

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 5 points 8 hours ago

At Christmas the topic of what videos we watch came up and I was shocked to hear over half the people there mention watching AI videos. Its insane, these are decent intelligent people watching shit like that stupid weightlifting cat and bigfoot vlogging. It seemed mostly because they couldn't get rid of YouTube shorts but still. The family members who used Instagram had it way worse they only consumed reels slop and didnt watch any long form video. It was really are "we are so cooked moment".

[–] FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

You see a lot of ai videos of prominent personalities, seriously doubt they have permission to use their identity.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

And yet I don't see any of that. Lots of people complain about "the algorithm" but it seems to be working well for me.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

My algorithm is as simple as avoiding YouTube altogether and finding what I need elsewhere (preferably in text form).

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The worst thing I've found with the algorithm is that it continually tries to steer me towards right-wing crap like Jordan Petersen and various manosphere posers, even though I watch a lot of LGBTQ+ and Marxist channels. And if ever you come to YouTube with no account on a clean machine on a new IP address, it pushes almost entirely right-wing propaganda videos.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Holy shit, yes. You can watch leftist content for years, but heaven forbid you watch one gaming-related video and it assumes you're an alt-right racist gamergate incel.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 19 hours ago

its either that or, thirst trap videos. i dont log in, so i just close the browser and reopen youtube and its gone.

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I noticed that they show up in the next section of video game related videos before I blocked those type of channels. It is interesting that video game clips tend to result in those type of podcasters showing up in those feeds, which is likely due to the strategy used by those groups using games to try to reach that demographic.

[–] placebo@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Same. I had an issue with AI videos at some point, but some dislikes later I don't see them anymore.

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago

You need an account for an algorithm, which I dont use with youtube. My algorithm has been blocking channels.

And when it comes to search results youtube isn't great usually defaulting to showing the highest subscriber videos over what might be more relevant and pushing down smaller channels.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 4 points 17 hours ago

When new channels show up on my recommendations I like to check out how old the channels are, especially if the quality is low or the voice is a clear or probably robot. AI channels don't tend to be very old, and they tend to have insanely high upload speeds. Cranking out hour-long, edited, topical (not gameplay for example) videos every single day is hard as hell and nobody can do it without building up to it with editors and maybe script writers.

For example, Simon Whistler is the most prolific video creator I can think of and he's got a crew to do it full time, but he's been at it for ages and he's there in all the videos.

I hate it that channels that never before had face cams are increasingly having to use them or otherwise change things because it's the easiest way (for now) to prove they're actual humans. But that's the hell we've been dragged into.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 3 points 14 hours ago

Would be nice if youtube made it easier to block channels.

[–] Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

Meaning that the only thing that changed is that it is "AI" and that they can cram out more bullshit in less time.

[–] morto@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

We spend more energy to create more videos and use more storage

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Are brainrot videos the ones where someone on an impossibly clean set hides the 5 seconds of info you were promised somewhere in a 20 minute video the purports to explain the process you need and it end up no longer matching the software’s UI?

Asking for a friend ;-)