this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
228 points (99.1% liked)

News

33699 readers
3485 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The evidence suppression hearing in the case against accused CEO killer Luigi Mangione concluded Thursday after the defense signaled it would call no witnesses.

The nine-day hearing will determine what evidence will be used against Mangione when he goes on trial on charges of gunning down UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson on a Manhattan sidewalk last year.

The defense has argued the officers violated Mangione's constitutional rights against illegal search and seizure because they lacked a warrant when they searched his backpack after Mangione was apprehended in a Pennsylvania McDonald's five days after the shooting.

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 108 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

because they lacked a warrant when they searched his backpack after Mangione was apprehended in a Pennsylvania McDonald’s

The cops figuratively shoot themselves in the foot, because they're so used to plea deals they forgot how a lawful investigation is supposed to work.

They claimed there was danger and that's why they apprehended him and separated him from his bag without Miranda. But forgot that once that happened, they were no longer legally allowed to search the bag without a warrant because there was no imment threat.

Then even after searching the bag, they found nothing.

Until after the bag was at the station and searched again.

The single cop who drove the bag to the station was photographed leaving with no gloves on, testified there was no reason she'd have put gloves on while driving, but was photographed with gloves on while turning the bag in.

It's going to be insane if anything from the bag is admitted, and since it's "public knowledge" what was in the bag it's influenced every potential juror and may be grounds for a mistrial already.

I feel like they're dragging it out because they know it's gonna be bad, but that's not going to help anything, people aren't just going to stop caring about this.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 76 points 3 days ago

The orange turd tweeting that he firmly believes Luigi to be guilty AND the DOJ retweeting that should already be a basis for a mistrial, on the argument that with these events, there's no way to conduct a fair and proper trial anymore as the government itself has influenced judge, jury and public.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Setting aside the legal probability of the matter: it’s my staunch belief that whether or not he actually killed the guy (and I remain categorically unconvinced on that front), Luigi did nothing wrong.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Repeat after me folks "Jury Nullification". I'm shocked how many people don't know anything about it. (Not saying you don't, just venting).

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s not that shocking. Prosecutors do not like it when jurors mention it. So if you get pinged for jury duty ever, do not bring that up, ever. But you can and should bring it up in deliberations, assuming the situation is appropriate.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 10 points 3 days ago

In general, if you want to be on a jury say as little as possible (and vice versa)

[–] Johnmannesca@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Oh I'm certain Jim Crow knows, given the unfortunate history of the civil rights movement in the US, folks like Sammy Younge Jr were assassinated and their killer would be acquitted by an all white jury.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

This is the OJ trail where they planted the gloves, but this time they planted a gun. So Lugi should be sit free just like OJ. But unlike OJ Lugi is innocent.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah. And he totally hand-wrote the manifesto while on his way there!

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 68 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Seriously how in the fuck can more than a few weeks be justified?

[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 36 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Major cases moving forward this slowly is not unusual at all. It's usually to the defendant's advantage to draw things out.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 63 points 3 days ago

I'd agree except they are holding him without bail. He's going to end up doing 2 years in jail before they even get in front of the jury. That's insane.

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 45 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sixth amendment:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial...

Just because it's routine doesn't mean we should accept it. The current state of affairs is horrible for defendants (in jeopardy for months or years regardless of outcome, not to mention legal costs) and horrible for the public (justice delayed is justice denied).

Trump's uncanny ability to stall trials for years is a big part of why he's not in prison right now.

[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

You're absolutely right that this exists. Thing is, most defendents explicitly waive their right to a speedy trial. It's to their advantage to drag things out, generally.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"not unusual" doesn't explain it for me though. In this case it sounds like the literal only thing happening in several months is internal thinking for the judge. I admittedly did not read the article, but am I wrong about that?

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I could almost understand if it was super complicated, but this case seems pretty straight forward without too many loose threads waving around.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 61 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Fair and speedy trial" my ass

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

stringing this as long as possible hoping the news forgets about it him, plus to assure the rich that they are doing something. this is like how they treat trump too, just stringing it along knowing they wernt serious about actually convicting him.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 29 points 3 days ago (2 children)

May? It's December ffs. Why do only Trump and other fascists get fast results when they want them?

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

Nine day hearing, and now the judge will sit on their ass for five months. Apparently the sixth amendment means nothing now.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
  • Trumps hush money trial ran completed 15 months after it started.
  • Georgia election interference 27 months.

There were some quick ones dismissed before trial. I hate Trump but let’s not just say whatever we want as you’re factually incorrect here.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But those were against him, and hobbled by insane bending to accommodate him. No punishment at all for 34 felonies? Not even a cursory probation period? I got probation for my first arrest at 14, for a misdemeanor, along with a huge list of restrictions on my activities. Not to mention, I was arrested, strip and cavity searched, and held in juvenile detention under 24 hour lockdown for 3 days before seeing a judge. He gets no trial at all for stealing government documents and covering it up? When he goes after people now that he's in power, the judiciary speeds up what he wants and slows down whatever could stop him.

You’re absolutely right here, but your initial comment was talking about timescales and I merely gave some timescales from trumps trials.

Yeah he’s awful and we (world, in UK) have a two tiered justice system.

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

For anyone confused about how May is even an option, the article sort of explains it.

Sort of.

New York Judge Gregory Carro gave the defense until Jan. 29 to make its final argument about the evidence in writing.  Prosecutors have until March 5.  The defense then has two weeks after that to submit a reply.

Carro said he expected to issue his decision about what, if any, evidence to exclude on May 18, at which point he would also set a date for trial.

[–] not_me@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

Verdict ? NOT guilty