Maybe it was addressed at Smalltalk programmers. 😉
memes
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
Not with that attitude it's not!?!
(Americans be like: skill issue, git guud)
wrong sub should be a shitpost
People who are responsible for the Wayland protocol: "This seems like a good idea, but also give veto rights to weirdos."
Technically it can be, since PEMDAS is not an immutable law, it's convention so we can communicate maths and come to the same answer.
It's a convention just as letters and digits are. If you communicate with people, you better follow the convention they are used to or make it explicit when you don't. That is when your goal is to be understood of cause. Otherwise dkfurveekfifrhrvaakdjf I guess
BEDMAS is just as immutable as the idea that those symbols represent numbers and operations. All math is based on conventions; you can't just decide that some are more important than others.
At least twice now I've had math nerds get really mad when I suggested "if people are misreading it, add parentheses". Very much skinner "it's the children who are out of touch".
Some people would rather be right than understood, I guess.
No one's going to die because you write x = c + (a * b) even though those parentheses aren't strictly needed.
PEMDAS isn’t even real. It’s something we made up to make stupid people feel better about being poor communicators. I challenge someone to create a word problem that actually requires the use of pemdas where you couldn’t just reword the problem to actually make sense.
Creating fake problems by inserting ambiguity is ridiculous.
The point is to allow more concise representation of problems that don't include words. If you're willing to be arbitrarily verbose, you can just add enough parentheses that you don't need the other five letters.