this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
164 points (98.2% liked)

science

22957 readers
319 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 30 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Scientists? You mean Civil Engineers?

[–] HowAbt2day@futurology.today -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Doctors? You mean dentists?

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Why no, not like that.

More like "doctors? You mean bio-chem researches".

[–] YetAnotherNerd@sopuli.xyz 23 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

“This article is more than 24 years old

Still an awesome article if you’ve never read it.

[–] Tithen@anarchist.nexus 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Am I missing something here? The article was posted in 2019

[–] YetAnotherNerd@sopuli.xyz 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I’m an shit! I was trying to find the actual bridge that has since been built, based on the design. I found an article on The Guardian from 2001 (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/nov/01/engineering.internationaleducationnews) , about the same work that was done. And I conflated the two because it’s a damn old article. Now, this one is from 6 years ago, which is still pretty old… but it’s a cool article

[–] Tithen@anarchist.nexus 4 points 13 hours ago

Oh that's awesome that a version of it got built! Thanks for sharing

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 6 points 14 hours ago

And the thesis is from 2019 too.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 21 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

To construct it they would have had to build a support structure nearly a thousand feet long, across a river, that could take the weight of a masonry arch bridge nearly a thousand feet long until the keystones could be put in. Not hard to imagine why it got rejected.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

That was basically just the process of creating bridges back then, it's not far off from how it works today...

I don't think that was an avoidable issue, you need to build temporary support structures while bridge building is in progress. In other words, if an extensive support structure is a deal breaker for you, it turns out you're not building a bridge today.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 1 points 34 minutes ago

Sure, but think of the scale of what they would need and the technology they had. 1000 feet long and as tall as a ship, carrying a stone structure that would weigh probably hundreds or thousands of tons, across what I'd imagine was a pretty busy waterway.

[–] NegentropicBoy@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 5 points 14 hours ago

3069: " hey look at that! The left leptomagnetic symbophone is just as Einstein said it would be! "

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

A bridge that doesn't get built doesn't work, so.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 5 hours ago

"You can't cross 100% of the bridges you don't build."