this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
971 points (99.4% liked)

memes

18432 readers
2135 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 97 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Playing through Persona 3 Reload at the moment. Not come across this gem yet but I have come across this:

collapsed inline mediaTelling a child she's at fault for her parents divorce.

[–] meejle@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

I genuinely said "beep boop" in this scene and she did not appreciate the joke. 😂

[–] Dumhuvud@programming.dev 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I get what they're doing with the lens flare or whatever, but I feel like illustrating the glasses like that just doesn't work in a still shot. Looks like he's wearing a white eye patch or something.

[–] Linearity@piefed.zip 2 points 1 day ago

ROG ALLY USER DETECTED??

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Going for the evil ending, are we?

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Want to be cloooooooooose

[–] _thebrain_@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 day ago (4 children)

My wife doesn't use an ad blocker. I installed a pihole about 6 years ago and she got so incensed, and demanded I remove it. Eventually I carved out a rule on the router to assign her a different DNS server. I just don't get it.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I have a similar story… But first off, you can do that directly through the pihole’s UI. No need to set up custom DNS stuff just for her. Just create an empty blocklist, and assign her devices to only use that list. Multiple blocklists are also handy if you have kids, because you can set things like porn blocklists, and only assign them to the kids’ devices. So you can still jork it when you want, without the kids being able to accidentally stumble across anything.

I have a basic blocklist for guests as well, which is the default list for any new device that connects to my guest network. It selectively blocks some of the more invasive BS but doesn’t block some of the more “this will make things on your device stop working” trackers, like how some Google devices refuse to work unless you allow their trackers.

I’m pretty sure you can even set lists to default based on an IP range? Like if you have multiple subnets for different VLANs, you can set a default list (or lists) for each VLAN. So like you can have an IoT VLAN with a default “stop phoning home, I just want to be able to cast to you” type of blocklist. Then your guest VLAN can have its own default list. And your personal devices can have their own list as well. I haven’t personally dug into that yet, but it’s on my list of future projects.

My wife was annoyed with my dual piholes until I got some basic whitelists dialed in for her. She’s a stock Android user, and my Google blocklist broke basically all of her phone’s native apps… Because Google’s invasive tracking is fully wormed through all of them.

It basically took an evening of us hunt-and-peck’ing our way through her phone’s blocked requests, whitelisting one thing at a time to see what was necessary and what was just tracking BS. I set her up with an automatic VPN that connected whenever she was away from the house, so she was always connected to the home network, and always protected by the pihole. Once we got that figured out, (and she learned to stop clicking the damned sponsored Google search results, which fail to connect with the pihole), she basically stopped noticing it. She got used to having it. She started taking it for granted…

We recently moved, and I haven’t had time to set my media/server stuff back up yet. I’m just running the basic ISP modem/router for the time being. And now that she got used to the pihole, she has been hit with whiplash because she’s suddenly seeing ads again. She visited her usual World of Warcraft site, and was like “what the fuck is this? The damned site is basically unusable…” She insists on using Chrome, (because it’s what her phone uses, and she wants to sync between the two), so I was only able to install the lite version of uBlock Origins as a stopgap, because Google intentionally broke the full version.

What really got her was when she noticed our Roku TV’s idle screen suddenly had ads. She was like “what the hell do you mean the goddamned TV has built-in ads? We aren’t even watching anything right now! It’s just the fucking sleep screen!”

Yes dear, why do you think I insisted on setting the pihole up years ago? Ads are invasive, and you don’t even realize how bad it is until you’re out. Once you get used to living without them, going back is rough.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago

She probably also feasts on AI slop. Just gobbling that shit up.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She ever give a reason, or nah?

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If it’s not about getting points in games for watching ads then there’s never a reason given.

[–] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Mine literally got upset that she wasn't seeing/able to click on the sponsored google results...

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 20 hours ago

Time to get a divorce

[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 42 points 1 day ago
[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yesterday I sat across a woman on the subway who had to rapidly tap her smartphone's screen every few minutes to stop loud video ads.

Was tempted to lecture her about the existance of adblockers. (But didn't, following established subway etiquette...)

[–] superduperpirate@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She’s apparently never heard of earbuds either

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She didn't watch videos, just scrolling and reading.
Only interrupted by regular autoplay video-ads from hell...

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 day ago

Jesus. I don't think an adblocker would help if she couldn't manage the fucking volume buttons.

Lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink and all that.

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Good time to mention this if you don't already use it, or if you do use blockers, maybe consider this:

https://adnauseam.io/

It's AdBlocker, BUT actually, what it does is "click" on all the ads. Every adclick costs the advertisers, and makes targeting ads meaningless because of all the noise. From your end, nothing has changed, the ads are gone... but from the advertisers end, you're costing them more money and making their data useless.

[–] wischi@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Is it reliable? Ad-blocking is a cat and mouse game and to actually have a useable ad-blocker it needs to be well maintained over a long period of time (for example like ublock origin).

Their concept looks nice, but they are researchers and I'm a bit afraid that they just drop that, write a paper about it and that's it. If there is no constant maintenance this will likely stop blocking YouTube Ads once Google deploys the next changes.

Update: checked the repo and it's actually a fork of ublock origin, so it should (for now) be pretty similar, but still they would have to keep maintaining that.

[–] sus@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's been maintained for over 10 years by now so it shouldn't be going anywhere.

[–] wischi@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

Wow didn't now that. I'm surprised I never heard of it, but I will definitely give it a try.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

It's not that cut and dry. Yes, it brings the ad industry ever so slightly closer to collapse...

But until then, you're just helping Google sell ad buys faster and pumping up their metrics

Google has gotten fined for doing exactly this fraudulently multiple times to juice their numbers

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

That's... Beautiful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thingAmaBob@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For real. No one else in my life uses Adblocker, so when I visit, I’m reminded of how horrible ads have gotten.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't like the term "NPC", but like... the adridden experience they just endure without just googling "how to stop ads" makes me really wanna call them "NPCs"

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 4 points 20 hours ago

Any term we pick is going to be offensive. We're gesturing at the concept of them being less human than us

But like... It's kind of true. It's like they don't experience the world around them, they just adapt to it without comment like a Sim

They just seem like they're missing the spark. NPC is probably a kinder term than what we'd come up with otherwise

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The other day I had to use a browser without any plugins to go to a site, and it was unrecognizable with all the ads. When I normally visit it's clean and simple. These ads pushed content under the fold. Horrible.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 20 hours ago

I'll never understand how people just rawdog the internet like that

Whenever I disable it to access a feature that breaks under it, I remember how cursed these sites have become. Reminds me of just before pop-up blockers were common.

[–] lonlazarus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Reminds me of talking to a tech bro excited to give Google more information so his ads are more accurately targeted to him.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the ads actually targeted me with things I'd actually like, instead of trying to manipulate me, I'd probably care less. But they don't, because shareholders want larger margins.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

True... Except there's a big problem with that

There's not many things I would want that I'm not aware of

So would they going to show me 2 ads a day, or would the same 4 things be plastered everywhere each week?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

My work PC does not have adblock, and I'm always a little culture shocked whenever I am forced to use Edge for something.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

a lot of judgement here from someone that doesn't know what a hamburger is

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also when someone you know uses Windows 11.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have to for work but I make sure to tell everyone it's only because I have to.

Shit, I've done it again.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You'd rather be using arch 😜

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Mint. Because I am a basic bitch.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 27 minutes ago

Imagine working in IT and having colleagues that don't use adblockers.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago

Yep, its disgusting, major red flag, but shockingly common.

Apparently my standards are too high.

Some people don't mind resuming their viewing. Younger generations seem to genuinely not care.

https://youtu.be/Fj8-r30sSn0

load more comments
view more: next ›