I'm more concerned about the neighbor that has verbally expressed a desire to use economic means to pressure Canada into agreeing to be annexed only to become a territory with no representation while they've also enacted a decades long propaganda campaign to destabilize one of our most resource rich regions with pro-separatist messaging? If Canada is the Ukraine, then Alberta is Crimea in 2014 and Russia is the United States, bro.
Canada
What's going on Canada?
Related Communities
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
- Alberta
- British Columbia
- Manitoba
- New Brunswick
- Newfoundland and Labrador
- Northwest Territories
- Nova Scotia
- Nunavut
- Ontario
- Prince Edward Island
- Quebec
- Saskatchewan
- Yukon
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
- Anmore (BC)
- Burnaby (BC)
- Calgary (AB)
- Comox Valley (BC)
- Edmonton (AB)
- East Gwillimbury (ON)
- Greater Sudbury (ON)
- Guelph (ON)
- Halifax (NS)
- Hamilton (ON)
- Kingston (ON)
- Kootenays (BC)
- London (ON)
- Mississauga (ON)
- Montreal (QC)
- Nanaimo (BC)
- Niagara Falls (ON)
- Niagara-on-the-Lake (ON)
- Oceanside (BC)
- Ottawa (ON)
- Port Alberni (BC)
- Regina (SK)
- Saskatoon (SK)
- Squamish (BC)
- Thunder Bay (ON)
- Toronto (ON)
- Vancouver (BC)
- Vancouver Island (BC)
- Victoria (BC)
- Waterloo (ON)
- Whistler (BC)
- Windsor (ON)
- Winnipeg (MB)
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Hockey
- Main: c/Hockey
- Calgary Flames
- Edmonton Oilers
- Montréal Canadiens
- Ottawa Senators
- Toronto Maple Leafs
- Vancouver Canucks
- Winnipeg Jets
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
- Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
- Toronto FC
💻 Schools / Universities
- BC | UBC (U of British Columbia)
- BC | SFU (Simon Fraser U)
- BC | VIU (Vancouver Island U)
- BC | TWU (Trinity Western U)
- ON | UofT (U of Toronto)
- ON | UWO (U of Western Ontario)
- ON | UWaterloo (U of Waterloo)
- ON | UofG (U of Guelph)
- ON | OTU (Ontario Tech U)
- QC | McGill (McGill U)
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
- Personal Finance Canada
- Buy Canadian
- BAPCSalesCanada
- Canadian Investor
- Canadian Skincare
- Churning Canada
- Quebec Finance
🗣️ Politics
- General:
- Federal Parties (alphabetical):
- By Province (alphabetical):
🍁 Social / Culture
- Ask a Canadian
- Bières Québec
- Canada Francais
- Canadian Gaming
- EhVideos (Canadian video media)
- First Nations
- First Nations Languages
- Indigenous
- Inuit
- Logiciels libres au Québec
- Maple Music (music)
Rules
- Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
Historically Russia has questioned our sovereignty and claims our Arctic is theirs.
But the US is the bigger enemy.
The russia and the US are becoming allies.
Trump famously drew a line straight across Ontario and Quebec, presented this map on international news and said that the border was an arbitrary line based on bad old deals, effectively making everything East of Brampton, the United States. I didn't really exaggerate almost any of what I just said.
Plot twist, Russia and America work together to swing Canada one way or another before they fight each other for Canada.
That would be a plot twist. Far more likely is that they go in on it together.
The US has viewed Canada as America's rightful property since 1775. Russia of course interested in on the Arctic seaways that are going to open up in the coming decades, but Canada 's greatest threat always has, and will continue to be, its Southern neighbor. Russia won't need anything from the Northwest Territory or Nunavut for the same reason that the UK isn't horribly concerned with shipping lanes off the coast of Norway.
I don’t think the US would allow that to happen, not because they are our allies, but because when push comes to shove, they think of Canada as within their area of influence.
This is supported by the fact that they have Alaska there, which is very, very close to Russia.
Letting Russia chew through Europe would mean EU has less influence in global politics, that’s not really a factor with Canada.
What I mean is that we should be on guard but imo US will always be a greater threat to our sovereignty than Russia, as the latter already has undisputed partial access to the arctic but the US does not.
Considering Trump just relaunched Monroe 2.0, this is the correct answer.
We're in what the American administration considers their sphere of influence. This is going to be true no matter what our relationship with the US is, friend or foe.
They may team up
not because they are our allies, but because when push comes to shove, they think of Canada as within their area of influence.
But mostly because they have always thought of Canada as the buffer zone between the US and Russia.
I agree.
Letting Russia chew through Europe would mean EU has less influence in global politics, that’s not really a factor with Canada.
And this whole proxy war against Russia has been not that bad of a deal for the US, which is why it's so regrettable that the US is now withdrawing its support.
But letting Russia encroach via Canada is basically the opposite situation of letting the US (through NATO) encroach via Ukraine. Their stupid golden dome is not as effective if Russia can just move underneath.
Yeah sure. Russia will decide to attack us before the former URSS entities. This article is just propaganda. I guess to push us to the 5% of GDP Trumo want for us instead of assessing the right percentage for our situation
Did you mean USSR? I assume so but it is just “not obvious” enough that I may be missing out on what URSS means.
Yes USSR. In french it is URSS
Don't even need to read one paragraph down before being able to correctly guess this is another propaganda piece pushed by Scotty Sockpuppet.
@AGM
I just want to thank you for your respectful and sophisticated comment.
You're welcome, Scotty! You fully deserve it.
I see that you have responded to multiple people this way.
I have never heard of you but your responses lead me to believe that they are correct.
No and this is propaganda bullshit
Thank you for this deep insight.
It doesn't need to be deep fam, it's pretty embarrassing to scaremonger about Russia when your neighbor is the American Empire that has made specific territorial threats against you.
Just today, Russia's state-controlled propaganda agency TASS cited Alexander Moiseev, the head of the Russian Navy, who said that, according to him, NATO countries have significantly stepped up their spying activities in the Arctic.
Moiseev was quoted as saying that anti-submarine aircraft based in Iceland had become much more active, a reference TASS said to U.S., British and Canadian surveillance planes.
Moiseev, who also spoke of NATO plans to deploy strategic surveillance drones in Finland, was cited as saying that NATO’s aim was to contain Russian activities in the Arctic.
So the U.S. may be a threat, but so is Russia. And don't forget China which is seeking access to the Arctic as well.
The new Trump Doctrine national security strategy document (the same one that attacks Europe for being too woke) is all about how the Western Hemisphere is theirs and does not identify Russia as a US adversary. Corollary: we already have a pimp.
No, they won't. Russia won't risk going to war with NATO (mentioned in the article). Now if they try the "grey-zone" tactics, who's to say they're not already doing that with Canada and many other countries..
That presumes that NATO will continue to be an effective deterrent. I’m not convinced that’s the case in the coming years.
While the US is a very big chunk of NATO, it's not ALL of NATO. And while the US has certainly betrayed its principles, the other members seem to be waking up to that fact.
In practice, Finland and Poland are the greatest protection against Russia as they are very much in the way and would trigger all of NATO.
Many European counties have very credible defence industries. From what we have seen in Ukraine, NATO (even without the US) has both a technological and tactics advantage against Russia.
We are also seeing that warfare has changed. He who makes the most drones and cruise missiles wins.
And Europe could massively outspend Russia, again without help from the US.
Germany has massively stepped up their military spending. If they had to, Norway to completely fund a NATO war against Russia on their own.
The only thing the US really brings to NATO these days is their nuclear arsenal. But again, Russia has shown that their “superiority” in this area is useless in practice. It will not help them in a war with Europe.
The only way that Europe loses against Russia is if the US teams up with them. This used to be an insanely unlikely outcome but….
Russia is far down the list of countries most likely to invade Canada.
The most of countries likely to invade Canada is as follows:
- the USA
Nobody else could manage a land assault on North America. Coming in from the arctic would be almost impossible.
Invading from the west or south means the US is in the way. And the US is unlikely to tolerate an invasion to the continent anyway (unless they are involved). And where is an invasion from the east being staged? Europe?
China has a better chance than Russia because they're actively planning an invasion of Taiwan and developing landing capabilities Russia doesn't have.
Also China has a drone production advantage over Russia. Which drones would be absolutely necessary to affect any real control over Canada's vast wilderness.
Not that I think China would... They seem perfectly capable of using economic tactics to secure their interests.
You're assuming the Russians won't have help from the US Navy
if FNV has taught me anything, the supply lines through the arctic will basically make this impossible.
I'm not worries about Russia because they are digging a huge hole in Ukraine. Who are they going to use to attack Canada? They're even scraping North Korea for bodies in Ukraine.
They can barely keep supply lines open for an attack on a country next door to them. How are they going to feed a supply line on the other side of the planet?
They could nuke us, but to what end?
Maybe 10 years ago I might have thought they could have done damage, but seeing them in Ukraine just shows they don't have the talent or the infrastructure for an attack of that size. Canada is a huge country.
I'm not worried about the US because Trump is pushing out all the intelligent people and bringing in minions who study cocksuckery. In a year all the talent will have left the military. Even a few months ago they couldn't even manage to bomb known positions of reactors in Iran. They don't understand what would be involved in a land war with a neighbour who looks and sounds just like them. Not to mention probably more than half the US wouldn't support an invasion of Canada. Most of the would wouldn't support it.
Yeah, it would be a huge mess but it's a mess that would tear their country apart and result in crippling sanctions from the world.
Trump's administration is incredibly stupid, but I think enough of them realize this.