I'm sure she'll have a classy response like, "Go fuck yourselves", or, "The Dems are the real pedophiles".
this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
196 points (100.0% liked)
politics
26561 readers
2118 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"Ask your Mom"
Removing all traces of Trump is a monumental effort, please be patient
…as she furiously wipes eraser shavings off her desk.
She's getting high off all the sharpies
Maybe, she spilled correction fluid all over the first copy and has to start over.
Our black magic markers ran dry, we had to run out to the store to get more. Give us another week.
“Are you guys still talking about that?”
Yall. We are never. Getting those files.
The shutdown ended, and then all of a sudden there was a vote to release the files. For a little bit I thought it'd be vetoed or pocket vetoed, but then all of a sudden the president signed off on it.
Call me silly, but when the files didn't come out the very next day, I was like "ok so this is where the shenanigans kick in"
No shenanigans kicked in before the vote to release. Like a few days before Trump ordered, and Bondi complied opening investigations into Clinton, JP Morgan, and a few others. The bill says they can withhold anything involving on going investigations. Like they teed this up ahead of time to not release a thing but be able to say they voted to do so.
At least not the interesting and essential ones. They'll be withheld due to "national security".
"There's a slight delay, we need more shredders and burn barrels."
Honestly I feel like these are the types of questions that might elicit an accidental moment of truth. I'd imagine it might go as follows.
Interviewer: You got those files?
Bondi: There's a slight delay.
I: Waiting on shredders and burn barrels?
B: That's not a good way to hide damning info. Redacting is better idiot.
I: ... So you're redacting info then?
B: But but but... Biden was old! And used autopen!
They should ask her about that silly binder stunt, too.
I'd love to see her dragged onto the stand and get her under oath about a lot of things.
If/when the orange skidmark's time passes, she will have a LOT to answer for.
I'd love to see her dragged onto the stand and get her under oath about a lot of things
Doesn't help. They still lie and they still don't face any consequences.
When you're part of the fascist establishment, lying under oath isn't a crime. It's a job requirement.
"we're awaiting a fresh shipment of thick black markers, unfortunately they're delayed at the border because the US doesn't manufacture goods and nobody's figured out how to pay the tariffs"
Ran out of sharpie and they're waiting on a big order.