this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
117 points (92.7% liked)

science

22767 readers
179 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ava@piefed.blahaj.zone 40 points 2 days ago

That's cool, but I do that too. So don't think you're special, ants!

[–] stelelor@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 days ago

I was going to make fun of the title (which is basically "Sick ants stink, the others don't like it and make it stop") but IMO this is the important bit:

Then, the team conducted an experiment showing that the sick pupae only produce the smell when worker ants are nearby, proving it is a deliberate signal for destruction.

That does go beyond just smelling bad due to illness.

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This article is so badly written that is basically unscientific shit and Dr. Dawson (assuming the quotes are her exact words) is a joke of a scientist.

There is ZERO proof (obviously) that the pupae know a remote fuck of their condition and what's going to happen to them, let alone caring about "their genes".

Unbelievable...

[–] pisaguchi@eviltoast.org 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Did you read the source? I guess no.

"Our data suggest the evolution of a finely-tuned signalling system in which it is not the induction of an individual’s immune response, but rather its failure to overcome the infection, that triggers pupal signalling for sacrifice. "

And as for sciencealert, their goal is to make science accessible to anyone. I think there is nothing wrong with also engaging it in an entertaining way. They also link the sources, so they are much better than other clickbaiters and you can read through original article to verify their writings.

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The article, as it is, is unscientific bullshit. Period.

The words of Dr. Watson, as reported in the article, are unscientific bullshit. Period.

You don't have to "entertain" when talking about science, you have to inform, because when you make science accessible to everyone in this way, you are spreading ignorance and creating the substratum of pseudoscience, since common people won't read the paper, or even click on the link. Maybe not even go past the title (which IS clickbait).

[–] nullroot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I mean I agree with the sentiment, but that's just scientists vying for eyes on their project and hopefully in turn the money to continue research. That's literally just the way things are done. Don't hate the player dawg.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Science Alert is shit, I'm surprise it's allowed here

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago

Yet another thing I have in common with ants

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Young and old!

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe if there are more fjords ...

[–] Hazmatastic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I heard he got an award for those

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

One which he tosses about carelessly, but not too carelessly.

[–] watson@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] teft@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

Formica* morghulis

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Capitalism hasn't finished sucking you dry yet.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Should see me with a cold.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

I wonder what the infection was.