1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
To prevent a suspect from being legally harassed by the state indefinitely. Sometimes suspects are innocent.
Also, to ensure a speedy trial.
Also, many kinds of evidence, especially the ones available when these limits were put in place, degrade significantly over time.
I'm not being an asshole I'm just curious and wanted to understand this concept since I don't have any legal understanding. Thanks for the answer :)
There are a diversity of reasons. In some cases it is to protect the purpertrator.
In my state the statute of limitations for bring legal charges for child sex abuse is 4 years after the child turns 18.
If you were raped as a child you have file charges before you turn 22. Most people can’t even come to terms with what happened to them at that age, let alone file charges.
There have been four major attempts to remove that statute and all for failed.
What to know who funds the effort to prevent the statute from being changed?
The Catholic Church.
yeah that's fucked up. Tbf that is why I asked. I understand all the other justifications but for me not paying for a horrible crime just because ot's been too long is ridiculous. Sometimes it takes longer to gather evidence or to even identify the person
Reducing the number of false accusations. Prevents situations like someone claiming "Xyz stole my car 30 years ago, arrest them!".
Lack of evidence. It's almost impossible to definitively prove something that happened long ago to the level of reasonable doubt required by courts.
Relevance. Theft from 30 years ago has no bearing on anyone's life any more. For same reason the statute of limitations usually doesn't exist for murder. Murder from 30 years ago still impacts people today.
US-centric answer: Murder doesn't have any time limitations on being charged.
There are always going to be holes in the law, so it probably wouldn't be difficult to find some example of a horrible crime that finds a loophole in this, but the general idea is that the worst crimes have no statute of limitations.
Misdemeanors are usually fairly short, many felonies are longer, sex crimes are often (but not always) exempt, and murder has no limit in any state.
You really need to specify where you're talking about...
In America there's no limitations on federal murder, but some states do
I'm not talking specifically. The broader concept of crime prescription is difficult for me to grasp
In countries where the usual punishment for such crimes is a lengthy term of imprisonment, the operating theory that justifies that cruel punishment is that it will prevent more crimes being committed — both by the imprisoned, who is kept safely away from people we care about, and by the victims who might otherwise take matters into their own hands and start an eternal murderous blood feud if their urge for revenge isn't satisfied by the courts. Such arguments start to look increasingly indefensible in any case, no matter how heinous was the crime, as the decades go by without such events.
Many other reasons have been given. One more: let the archivists know when it's time to throw away the paperwork and evidence.
Some crimes go unsolved with a bit of evidence collected, stamped, filed and stored somewhere.
At some point you'll have to build a new building just to store the stuff if you never clear it out.
If you only keep the stuff for a few crimes such as murder the growth will be much more manageable.
