this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
162 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

68244 readers
4646 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] doug@lemmy.today 96 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Cool, another app I won’t download and will look sideways at whoever does.

If I see its userbase consists of gen z and younger I will be very disappointed.

[–] yoshisaur@lemm.ee 68 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm sorry but you're 100% going to be disappointed

[–] doug@lemmy.today 30 points 1 day ago

You’re right, I should set my expectations now.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

If I find out Lemmy.world has a mouse favicon I'm going to be disappointed

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago

He is really so dumb

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Wasn't the whole thing about China scooping up loads of data?

So give a copy of that data to one of the worlds largest advertiser/online markets and license behavioural data from the "baddies". Yeah, that'll fix everything.

Everybody loses.

[–] small44@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wasn't the whole thing about China scooping up loads of data?

No

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They've admitted it was about gaza

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Womble@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

I wouldnt trust the words of a Palantir exec if they said the sky was blue, but even accepting what they say, its just that the hamas attacks gave the ban impetus to move forwards. By his own words the ban already had bipartesan support and executive approval before that.

The headline that it was "about" Isreal rather than China is a massive reach.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

If not user data and network security concerns, what? Why the ban/sale song and dance?

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 day ago

People were opposing the Gaza genocide which is a joint American isreali project

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

Also money, which are just political points in tangible/fungible format

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's about content delivery, i.e. the CCP having direct control over what content (i.e. propaganda) is sent to Americans on the platform via their proprietary algorithm (with all the source code heavily guarded in mainland China).

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Controlling people's media experience to push political propaganda that helps powerful people and harms individuals - that seems really shitty.

I can't think of any app developer or political party who would do that.

(This is an attempt at surrealist humor.)

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 2 points 13 hours ago

Both can be bad.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

Control over what messages can be removed?

[–] 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

It was about the weaponization of the algorithm whereby China could incite Americans to act against the nation in a time of crisis or war.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

TikTok’s valuation remains contested, with estimates varying from US$20 billion ($31.8 billion) to more than US$300 billion, depending on whether its algorithm is factored in.

The algorithm increases the price by more than $280 billion. And what kind of algorithm? One that changes its high based on how you interact with it, to always try and get your dopamine flowing to keep you interacting longer. If it were a real substance, it would be the most addictive drug to ever exist.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

You could argue if xai paid xitter 45 billion in their latest ~~money laundering operation~~ acquisition, then TikTok is worth at least ten xitters

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 26 points 1 day ago

Surely US investors won't harvest data and/or enshittify the product!

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 14 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Why the fuck does this dude care so much about one social media platform being available here? Is he perving on dancing teenagers?

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Because it's been an incredibly successful propoganda vector for the youth vote.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Huh. Is that good or bad?

I don’t pay attention to TikTok. I’m not on there.

[–] Brandonazz@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

Very obviously bad. You want educated voters, not propagandized ones.

[–] RymrgandsDaughter@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Bad, it's why so many of them are magattes.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 7 points 9 hours ago

tiktok is used by genz and alpha alot, it helps that they would be the next generation of a dying GOP voters which are primarily boomers, Xers, and some milleneals.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 hours ago

I believe it is part of a strategy known as indoctrination

[–] El_Azulito@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Oh thank God, I thought the economy was about to collapse or something.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't fumble this loops. Now is the moment.

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Loops...kind of sucks. I get the point of it, but I tried using it like 15 minutes a day for a couple weeks to get used to it, but the features are lacking and the content is...well it's filled with people who would abandon tiktok and other apps, so, it's kind of boring.

Not in a 'there's no brainrot' way, in a 'this is the third video in a row of just random AI slop and then it's just some dude filming a tree for 20 seconds'.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

Bootstrapping is definitely going to be an issue. There was news they are supposed to have federation working and released tomorrow. Right now there's not even a client in the play store so I haven't bothered with it.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

People bitch about the algorithm but it's actually pretty nice having things you're more likely to enjoy come to you than having to try and hunt them down with nothing but a very poor search function.

I want it to recommend me shit I would probably enjoy; I just don't want it to recommend me shit in an attempt to brainwash me with their agenda. Barring that, get a better search function. Utilize tags and categories. Allow users to tag others' videos because you can't expect the uploader to think of every possible connection it could have.

I want to like Loops, but it's 90% random nature shots that don't need to be videos and finding anything else is a PITA.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 13 hours ago

so basically taxpayers will be paying china for an app that only 2% of the country uses

[–] MagicalAbyss@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Honestly, I don't who would be the better owner of Tik Tok at this point..

[–] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago