this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
434 points (99.1% liked)

politics

26427 readers
2522 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cv_octavio@piefed.ca 123 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Yeah. Tell us Canadians again how we'd be better off as a state in your miserable shithole of a country. I must have missed something about how awesome it is to ratfuck everything in sight and violate every creature's right to exist.

Fuck you, America, you worthless cunt of a nation.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As an American I approve this message.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

The YT algorithms have been pushing some Canadian podcasters about how Canada wants to join the US...then if you look up who in Canada wants this. It's basically a tiny tiny fraction of the country, and everyone of them are Canadian magats.

This country is being fucked by technocrats and the amount of idiots we have here who eat this shit up is insane. Had someone tell me the other day that most of Canada wants to become a US state, showed them this...which was before the dumbass turnip started his trade wars.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/u-s-eh-who-are-the-canadians-who-would-support-a-51st-state-1.7472194

Got nothing back which means they don't believe it.

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

As an American, let me thoroughly reassure you: we don't want Canada to join the Union either.

[–] cv_octavio@piefed.ca 10 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I don't think we were being asked to "join".

If I reflect on the subtext, it felt like more of a limp-dick threat from a group of entitlement-complex having old white assholes in charge of a country of under-educated, mouth-breathing, inbred racists, with a soupçon of imperialism.

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

in charge of a country of under-educated, mouth-breathing, inbred racists, with a soupçon of imperialism.

I'm not disagreeing with you, but I hope you don't think Canada significantly fewer of those degenerates per capita than we do.

Yours might be a slightly different flavor, and they not be as emboldened as ours -- but those shitbirds are universal and will absolutely destroy Canada just like the USA if you're complacent.

[–] cv_octavio@piefed.ca 1 points 16 hours ago

You're right and that's why I'm mad now, and not after we voted in a dictator. Hindsight and a nickel will get you a cup of jack shit these days it seems.

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world -3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

So is this xenophobia you have or specifically you hate all Americans?

[–] cv_octavio@piefed.ca 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Xenophobia implies a phobia.

I'm not afraid off you, and if I was, I don't think it would be an irrational fear. Generally, on average, if we bell-curve this shit, your're (sometimes) well-meaning idiots with far too much ego and power, who collectively need a serious serving of humble fuckin' pie. Often you're not even well-meaning. Nothing to be afriad of, but a blight to be assiduously avoided for ones own well being and sanity.

As far as hate: I don't hate Americans for being Americans. I can and will also acknowledge we have our share of maple maga; hate filled bigots with a selfish agenda.

Futhermore, this was done to you. Over generations. But you also chose to have it done to you. Over generations.

So: I sure hate the choices you make, but it's not possible to do better until you know better.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Xenophobia does not in fact imply a phobia. It is specifically the dislike or prejudice against those of other countries.

That being said, you're obviously justified in being pissed off at the bullshit going on right now, but that's a very common boomer defense along the lines of "I can't be homophobic cuz I'm not afraid of them I just hate them"

[–] cv_octavio@piefed.ca 0 points 15 minutes ago
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

We'd rather it be the other way.

[–] sausager@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, because we know they are far better off without us right? ..right?

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It’s not really union. More like “guidelines” than an actual union at this point.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago

I agree with your comments, but please remember their are plenty of Americans that would like their state to become a Canadian province.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 6 points 6 hours ago

America: The only country bad enough to enrage Canadians to the point of making a Scotsman blush.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

If Canada joined as multiple states it would be interesting...

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 3 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Instead of the 51st state, Canada could be 51 states, giving them a majority...

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago

Even just the 10 provinces would be a big change.

[–] cv_octavio@piefed.ca 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I'd prefer we just hold hands. We're not into you that way.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

worthless cunt of a nation

The chosen noun implies usefulness. I feel like we better embody a pimple. Or festering wound. You know, something that actively hurts and tends to spread. Like an overflowing toilet clogged with diarrhea and used condoms.

[–] cv_octavio@piefed.ca 2 points 18 hours ago

"Brimming with pus"

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 2 points 18 hours ago

"I would call you a cunt, but you have neither the warmth nor the depth."

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So, there was a vote in congress and senate for a law repealing it, or is this just another royal decree from the white palace?

[–] credo@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doesn’t matter. In the US legal system only the injured endangered species can sue him.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

No, just no.

Everyone has standing when it comes to wildlife laws.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Umm Trump just said nuh uh.

And SCOTUS just backed him up.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Yes.

No they didn't and that still wouldn't change being wrong about standing.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 9 points 21 hours ago
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 43 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Most of these fucking MAGAts enjoy hunting and fishing, in the pristine wilderness, and rage about the beauty of nature. Bunch of fucking hypocrites.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 19 points 17 hours ago

The main thing the Endangered Species Act does is limit development in the habitat of endangered species. The President of the United States is a developer. Of course he's targeting the Endangered Species Act. He hates it with a passion.

Also, his felony convictions are related to the overvaluation of land he owns that can't actually be developed due to a conservation easement that's the result of the Endangered Species Act.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago

They only claim to love nature so they can kill it. They bitch about seasons and the government limiting what they can take. Just like they say they “love America” but want to mow down the forests that make it beautiful and pave over it with oil derricks and gas pipelines. The same way they’re all about “gun safety” but leave guns where they can be used for everything from accidental shootings to be stolen and used in crimes.

They don’t mean what they say.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

I remember in the 80s my dad having a Ducks Unlimited sticker on his truck. I asked him what it meant, and he said "conservatism is about conservation, because we all want to keep America's natural beauty." Compare that to today, we're past the tipping point on so many things because they just refuse to allow the country's rich to lose a cent to remediating our mess. In a movie, this would be an implausible timeline.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

i hope he goes extinct

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So we can now shoot bald eagles?

Noice!

/s

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Seemingly, no. Bald eagles were taken off the federal threatened/endangered lists in like 2007, but there are other, more specific protection laws in place protecting the bald eagle.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I would imagine the migratory bird treaty act protects them, as they are migratory birds.

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Yep. The MBTA is a treaty between Canada, the US, and Mexico -- not so easy to simply ignore.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That might stop them if they cared enough to read.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 3 points 17 hours ago

Well tell canada to come burn the white house down again, maybe that will get the message across

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 1 points 17 hours ago

It seems to also include Japan and Russia. Birds flying across oceans still blows my mind.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only three animals will be allowed... Chicken, beef and pork..

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If only these endangered animals were tasty, it's their own fault for not evolving so that we don't farm them

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Some are tasty, like the Galapagos tortoise.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

collapsed inline media

...I kinda want one. Not sure if as a pet or an entree.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

So we need to annex the Galapagos? Do they have oil?

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 hours ago

You could probably grind the penguins into something useful.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

When do they start building condos all over the national parks?