this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
251 points (100.0% liked)

Uplifting News

17077 readers
644 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 114 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I just wanna stop for a moment and say I really appreciate all the hard work you're doing.

Its really not the easiest to find news stories that are sincerely really good news, and not just a slight letup of something awful.

Your posts make my timeline a much nicer place and I really appreciate it ❤️

[–] alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works 67 points 18 hours ago

Glad I was able to make somebody's day better

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 30 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

How? Where did they go? What caused it to spike in the first place?

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 62 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Evidence shows that early exposure to potential allergies reduces the likelihood of getting that allergy. Since we've know this doctors have recommended early exposure to allergens, instead of avoiding them. Now that we no longer avoid peanuts before adolescence, the allergy is receding.

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

adolescence

I assume you meant infancy?

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Changed, in to "before", iirc this impact persists a little past infancy, but yes not into the teens, I just was not thinking about my words.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago

The article is paywalled but the gist is in the tagline: people kept peanuts but babies for fear of allergies but lack of exposure leads to allergies.

I've been casually following this for awhile so here's some further insight: peanut allergies were on the rise worldwide except in one place...Israel.

Have you ever seen those "puffs" baby snacks? They're like Cheeto Puffs but made for babies. Easier to eat with a weaker flavor. They're popular across the world but there's a brand with a peanut variety that sells particularly well in Israeli.

After realizing the connection, they started studying it. I am assuming this article is the conclusion of that study.

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Is this because people who have peanut allergies are now dead?

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 15 hours ago

or because of more awarness and better food safety standards.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@piefed.zip 4 points 6 hours ago

It is because we are exposing infants to allergens which in turn trains their immune systems to not have the reaction to them. So any reaction other than sever from early, trace, exposure will allow for the child to grow up without the allergic reactions to them, and other allergens, not just peanuts.

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

But maybe... If we just covered our eyes for one year we'd be done with nut allergies forever. Of course not, but maybe...

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

Are you Louis C.K?

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 8 points 6 hours ago

a landmark trial in 2015 found that feeding peanuts to babies could cut their chances of developing an allergy by over 80 percent. In 2017, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases formally recommended the early-introduction approach and issued national guidelines.

The new study, published Monday in the journal Pediatrics, found that food allergy rates in children under 3 fell after those guidelines were put into place — dropping to 0.93 percent between 2017 and 2020, from 1.46 percent between 2012 and 2015. That’s a 36 percent reduction in all food allergies, driven largely by a 43 percent drop in peanut allergies.

Can't argue with those results. Thank God.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

So does that mean that this was really a Millenial problem? Cuz I don't think that you heard about this before the early 2000s, maybe the late 90s.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

As a late millenial, my guess for the cause of high prevalence of peanut allergy among younger people was because of being less exposed to dirt and being subjected to over-cleanliness when we were growing up. Iirc, the news and medical community overemphasised cleanliness in the 1990s. So, parents overdid it and the children's immune system has become less attuned and familiar to different foreign objects in the body. The immune system then overreacts to non-threatening objects in the body resulting in allergy.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

being less exposed to dirt and being subjected to over-cleanliness

I've read talk of this over the years. Anything definitive ever come out? Makes all the sense in thw world to me.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Mid to late 90s was when it started becoming a talked about threat, but 2000s was when we reached "oh my god even a molecule on the hem of someone's clothing is enough to kill 10 people" shit. If you trace backwards that means late Boomers and Gen Xers started, I think, Ziplock parenting a lot - less real play in the dirt, more sit on the couch and eat Dunkaroos.

Basically the last generation that had "be home when the streetlights come on" was the last generation to have the more resilient immune systems, and the two things are probably fairly related.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

That's sort of what I had in mind.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

It was definitely a thing at school in the 80s.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

My shrink told me we didn't even need to feed my son peanut butter, but that one or two small applications of PB to the chest during infancy would reduce the risk of allergy by a massive factor. His mom thought it sounded weird as fuck, but she asked his pediatrician, and then did it. He ain't allergic to peanuts.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 21 minutes ago

it's pseudo-diagnostic, you don't know whether he would have been allergic to peanuts if you didn't rub it on his chest

[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago