this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
81 points (90.1% liked)

Technology

76893 readers
2806 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lembot_0005@lemy.lol 25 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

The result is nice and cool. It is the level of modern journalism that is disturbing.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I worry about it. Every year I see more articles with sloppy mistakes that could be caught by any half-drunk editor phoning his job in. Sites springing up publishing 90% slop clearly so someone can keep writing. Not to mention the risks to journalism in a country where the president threatens any group whose speech he doesn't like.

As (i think) Parenti said, now is the time of monsters. Cool robot though. That, genuinely, is crazy impressive.

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I mean in this instance, if you look at the thumbnail of the author and then follow his link, he looks not a day over 16.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Im middle-aged, anyone under 30 looks like a baby to me 😅 babies can be journalists as long as they've got ethics and a good editor

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Seriously. How many ways are there to make an humanoid robot out of stainless steel and aluminium?

[–] toffi@piefed.social 23 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

"We've now constructed the doomsday machine from the popular novel 'Don't build the doomsday machine'"

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I like the original “torment nexus” phrasing better.

[–] toffi@piefed.social 8 points 9 hours ago

Ah I was quoting from memory. You're right the torment nexus line is better.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 points 9 hours ago

You have an overly broad definition of "doomsday machine."

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Why does it have boobs though? Is that like extra space For batteries? Why not a bellybutton if we are Going for realism?

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 21 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Because humans will put tits on anything. I watched a movie about sentient cockroaches, and the girl cockroaches all had tits.

collapsed inline media

[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

to be fair to the addition of bazongas, those characters are more 'humans in cockroach costumes' than 'sentient cockroaches.'

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Because when humans see a robot with boobs, the comments turn into "hey this robot has tits", and when they don't, the comments turn into "humanity is going to be euthanised by the machines".

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 9 hours ago

I'd say "found the bot", but even bots are familiar with why boobs appeal to human sensibilities.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 15 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

What clickbait. Apparently any vaguely capable humanoid robot is a "straight-up Terminator"?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

If you can't handle me at my Roy Baty you don't deserve me at my Pris Stratton

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That's the most "Terminator" looking robot I've ever seen.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

So far. Since Terminators are capable humanoid robots and the goal is to make capable humanoid robots each improvement is going to look more like a Terminator. And also like every other capable humanoid robot from other sci-fi as well, good bad or neutral.

The only reason to leap to "OMG it's a Terminator!" Is to bait the clicks.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

It looks the a Terminator "under the hood". I doubt anyone was trying to sell a "living tissue over metal endoskeleton" kinda headline.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

They meant that in terms of infiltration they're becoming more humanoid at an exponential level

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

"We're at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift."

What?

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Joe Wilkins clearly has a thing for robots.

[–] confuser@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago

Any mention of sexy robots deserves mention of sexy robots man

Hajime sorayama

[–] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 hours ago

That looks more like a Terminatrix

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 hours ago

In a follow-up event to prove it was a robot, He Xiaopeng had its leg skin cut open in front of a live audience. The robot then walked off the stage.

collapsed inline media

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 8 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

So they skipped the Dalek phase, huh?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 4 points 9 hours ago

Wheeled robots have been the norm for decades, we didn't skip that.

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Didn’t Daleks have little squishy aliens inside them?

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 4 points 4 hours ago

Yes, Daleks are not robots, they're squishy tentacle space nazis inside mobile battle casing pepperpots that they call War Machines. The Terminator T1 however looks vaguely like such a pepperpot if you squint and are Doctor Who brained.

[–] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

"We're at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift."

That's a low bar

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I’m not saying this because she’s a billionaire, and this is really nothing against her, her looks, or her music, but I never found Taylor Swift to be, like, sexy. She’s quite beautiful and very talented but she’s just not who comes to mind when I think of slinky sexiness.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I get you! She's extraordinarily beautiful, and not just in a blonde hair/blue eyes kinda way. I have an admiration for any man or woman who works hard to maximize their appearance. My wife is like that. She won't win any beauty pageants, but she is as attractive as it's possible to be for her. It's fucking hard work and Swift could do nothing to be any more attractive.

Turns out I like her music too! Kids listening to something, "That's cool, who's that?"

But sexy? Maybe she's too perfect? I like a woman that's "off" in some way. Maybe a big nose, wide-spaced eyes, pouchy mouth, gimme some imperfections that stand out.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 points 4 hours ago

She's a bit stiff IMHO.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

What is the endgame here? People are supposed to buy these? To do what?

The took the fabric off a mechanical device to reveal it was a mechanical device. Disturbing?

collapsed inline media

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'd buy one if it would help fight off ice agents.

[–] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

I read ice giants and thought I’d missed a headline today

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

To do what?

Chores and other stuff we don't want to/can't do. This has been the dream for decades now, so many old encyclopedias with "future tech" chapters show robots caring for people, sometimes as caregivers (for old people, or blind etc), sometimes as entertainers.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 hours ago

Robots will do everything slaves used to d without pay

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 4 hours ago

Gen 1 Synth lookin' motherfucker.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 2 points 9 hours ago

I won't die to anything wearing crocs!!

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

If the robot is tough enough for production they should have no fear of stripping the clothes off with a box knife. The whole scene was still pretty impressive, especially compared to last week's Russia bot! 🤦🏻‍♂️

But still, were I heading this project, I'd insist on toughness at this point in development. (Talking out my ass, looking to the end game, no idea where they're at ATM.)

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

tbh, with those hips I might eventually join the robots