Whatever they'll release, it won't be the original files.
this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
214 points (98.2% liked)
politics
26404 readers
3215 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I've been saying this since the start. The Trump administration will never release anything damaging to Trump.
They'll just release some fairytale. They've had months to get it in order.
Someone just told him they finished destroying the evidence that implicates him.
I think it's more a case of him thinking that he'll just veto it anyway.
Because now they're going to try and claim they "can't due to an ongoing investigation". This will be like pulling teeth.
His cult will believe it.
So what exactly is preventing them from releasing not just redacted but heavily edited "Epstein files" where they removed any hint of Trump and added a few additional democrat names for good measure? They've certainly had enough time to create something like that.
My biggest worry is what if they release doctored documents
To play the devil’s advocate, it’s certainly possible Trump publicly supports the House voting to release the original documents because he either 1) has ironclad assurance that it’ll die in the Senate, or 2) will just pocket veto the bill. There was substantial political downside to them opposing their release, and many many ways for them to kill this whole thing in the future.
Trump doesn’t want the files released, but their Legislative Affairs and Communications Director finally woke up to a strategy that wasn’t political suicide.
What do you mean "what if"? Of course thats what they're going to do.
The discharge petition itself contains the word "unclassified" which means all Bondi has to do is classify anything with Trump and friends names before the release.
Just like releasing his tax returns because "they were in an audit"
'DOJ still investigating the Dem names in the files..., sorry lol!'
Alright we are probably going to get two versions of the Epstein files the one edited by trump that will probably be released first and the real one that will be released later when Trump is dead or out of office in some way
I'm hoping the second one is released when the people named in the files released by the government go, "Oh no, we're not going down in this alone," and put out their emergency backups.
My own theory on the flip-flop back to his original stance:
-
The DOJ/FBI have finished sanitizing the entire document to clear Trump and Republican loyalists, so releasing it now will only help them.
-
The worst of the damning information (about Trump knowing about the girls and not stopping it) has already been made public so there's no point in hiding it anymore. Republicans have already spun the narrative as "not that bad" and Trump survived, so why not win some brownie points and release the official document in it's entirety?
I can't see any other reason for why he suddenly wants them to go public again. Trump only ever does things that serve his own self interests, so him blocking it for so long was beneficial to him in some way, and now continuing to block it doesn't benefit him.
Option 3 I think is most likely.
DOJ just started new investigations into Clinton, JP Morgan, and others at Trumps behest. Once vote happens to release files DOJ says "Oops no can do with an ongoing investigation." Repubs look like they care and nothong goes public.
Its an easy win win for them
Or someone finally explained that the discharge petition only allows for unclassified releases... Meaning Bondi can decide what should be released or not.
True, I did not think of that. Trump's new favorite tactic seems to be doing (or saying that he will do) the thing that everybody wants, but then complaining that his hands are tied by the courts or the law, even though neither of those things prevent him from breaking the law when it suits him. "Oops, sorry, we so badly wanted to release the full unredacted Epstein files but the law says we can't gosh golly darnit, what a bummer, you saw that I supported it, but it's these activist judges that are preventing the truth from getting out!"
Bondi is 100% running cover for him if they do get released.
Remind me what "the document" is, again? There have been thousands released this week.
You can also remind me when he survived any information already released in an actual court of law, since obviously anything else would be entirely irrelevant to anything.
Edit: Maybe it’s a “I’d release them if I could, but the investigations prevent me” situation.
That, or a "I know they don't have the votes in the Senate, so it's moot" situation.
The fix is in then.
Both valid theories I'd say.
So, either he just realized how guilty he's been making himself look... or, he's playing 4D chess with us, and just broke out the "reverse psychology" card. (wink, wink...nudge, nudge)
Well, Megan Kelly just tried to sell that not all pedophilia is bad. So, it's probably a gas-lighting plan. It'll probably work too. His base are all gullible fools.
And pedophiles too. Don’t forget his entire base are pedophiles, even if only by proxy.