this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
906 points (99.5% liked)

News

33140 readers
3194 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A 13-year-old student was expelled from a Louisiana middle school after hitting a male classmate who she said created and shared a deepfake pornographic image of her, according to her family’s lawyers.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 500 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

Nice to see the sheriff took action, since the school doesn't seem to give a damn.

charged with ten counts of unlawful dissemination of images created by artificial intelligence

The girl has been allowed back into school, only after a school board meeting voted to allow it; but 'on probation' and with the expulsion still on her record. The family is following up with a federal lawsuit because of that.

I'll note she didn't just hit him out of no where. She first reported it to school staff. They did nothing. She then tried to contact her dad and got told by school staff 'parents don't need to get involved'. The school then put her on the same bus as the offender, who showed off the image again to other students in front of her.

What else was she supposed to do. I'd have hit him too, and I'm almost 30.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 220 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Wow! WTF? Parents being involved seems the minimum. The way I see it, if the school took no action and the parents were intentionally not told, the kid got off easy without a full blown asswhoopin’.

[–] thebeardedpotato@lemmy.world 148 points 1 day ago

Fuck that school, their behavior is what allows this kind of thing to continue and turns these asshole kids into asshole adults… and then we end up with modern day US.

[–] Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 day ago

Sounds like a great cause for a law suit to me (not protecting a student). And we all know how much Louisiana cares about that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 95 points 1 day ago

I taught middle school briefly. I had a student that was sexually harassing another one of my students. Using “[student’s name] GYATT” as a nickname in kahoots and shit. The student being harassed had also transferred in from being homeschooled all her life - no experience dealing with this kind of shit.

Admin refused to do anything. I rearranged my seating chart to put them as far away from each other as possible, but admin blew me off when I asked if the problem student could be transferred to another class. Nope! Left me on read.

It’s insidious in Oklahoma. I imagine it’s the same in Louisiana. They really do not care about sexual harassment. It’s the “good old boy” system, where they refuse to consider it as anything more than a minor issue.

[–] AngularViscosity@piefed.social 56 points 1 day ago (9 children)

On probation for what, defending herself? Fucking hell.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 47 points 1 day ago

I would like to congratulate her on the new college fund after her parents sue the absolute shit out of the school.

Unfortunate for everyone else, but when a school says "parents don't need to get involved" they're doing something quite wrong

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Every one of the school officials who knew and did nothing should be charged as accomplices.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

I would think that all of the school officials could be brought up on charges of failing to report as mandatory reporters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago (6 children)

charged with ten counts of unlawful dissemination of images created by artificial intelligence

I'll bet that has a penalty of like $1.25 total.

Back when I was in school, they would have expelled him and gave her a high five (and told her not to get caught doing it again).

Her brothers or cousins might very well pay him a visit also.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If im the dad in that scenario I'm catching assualt charges then sueing for child endangerment, fuck everyone involved from the school.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 194 points 1 day ago (29 children)

Whooole lotta people in these comments defending the guy who produced and shared Child Exploitation Material. “She shouldn’t have resorted to violence, there were other options” “She shouldn’t have responded to bullying with physical assault” My favourite: “it was made with AI, so it’s not really child porn”

Why is a 13 year old girl being asked to act with the calm sensibility of an adult in this situation, but no one is asking why a 13 year old boy thought it was okay to sexually harass his classmate? If she should have known better, he bloody should have too.

While I agree that jumping to violence can sometimes be the wrong answer, there are at least two cases where you just gotta remind people that polite society has its limits: nazis, and people who are actively sexually assaulting a child. This person was openly sharing sexually explicit material of her with others in front of her. That is sexual assault under Louisiana law. And if you think asking a predator nicely to please stop ever works, you’re a naive fool.

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago (23 children)

I don't blame that girl one bit for hitting him. In fact, I hope she used her nails. Some people simply have no sense of boundaries until they receive percussive instruction.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 153 points 1 day ago (15 children)

I never understood US schools "logic" when it comes to deal with violence.

Yeses, she should not have hit that asshole, but they should expell him, and maybe give her a day or two of detention.

[–] Harkronis@kbin.melroy.org 105 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The same level of logic where the bully is somehow not at fault for when the bullied finally stands up to them.

Not that I'd know from personal experience or anything growing up from how many times it was somehow my fault for retaliating.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

As someone bullied a lot what I learned from them always punishing retaliation but not the action was to wait a day, be sneaky about it, then unleash all hell like youd never get another chance. If they're gonna punish me for being in the right Im gonna earn it, so I went big. They never found the rock that was in my hand though so I guess it worked out.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Ooops@feddit.org 56 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Punishing the victims should they dare to not stay quite is an honored tradition in schools and one that isn'tl limited to the US at all.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Rest of the world: Want to know why US schools have so many shootings? It's not just the availability of weapons (though that's the #1 factor).

Kids are taught from an early age that justice of any kind for their abusers inside school is never going to happen. Any action they take will likely result in expulsion—just like this girl—even for defending themselves.

With the microcosm of a social space that is school, what conclusion do you think kids will come to if they want justice? They don't see any bigger picture than the tiny little place on Earth they've been legally obligated to be inside of until they turn 18.

[–] Harkronis@kbin.melroy.org 32 points 1 day ago

And this situation is a stronger reason.

The girl has gone through every reasonable and righteous option she could of.

And the authority of all of those matters - failed her. So what was she left with? Punching the abuser. Now they're all like "WHUH?! OH MY GOD! U CAN'T DO THAAAAAAAT!!" despite them practically IGNORING what was happening. What did they honestly expect? For her to own it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She should get a high five instead of detention.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 91 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Petition to strip big balls of his medal of freedom and give it to this girl who showed courage in the face of adversity and no tolerance for bullshit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 79 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Why do the victims always get the short end of the stick in these cases?

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because theyre girls and are inherently sexual by gender, plus boys are a protected class

/S but i cant even tell if im joking or if this is just what it is now

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 59 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

So a boy made child p**n of a classmate and wasn't punished but the victim of the crime was?

Americans really living up to their president's standards eh

[–] StannisDMannis@lemmy.today 47 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

By the school.

The police charged the boy and not the girl.

Fucked up world where the school is bad and the cops good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 56 points 1 day ago (20 children)

Let me get this straight... some jackass made deepfake porn of a 13 year old and SHE gets expelled for giving him a well deserved smack?

I hope that asshole gets to be on a sex offender list at least.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Schools with zero tolerance policies are bullshit.

Sometimes kids hit other kids. They're figuring shit out.

Plus sometimes situations deserve a little violence.

Give a warning and expell the boy for the AI image instead. That does a hell of a lot more damage than a light smacking.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 30 points 1 day ago

Everything with a zero tolerance policy is bullshit and just an excuse to avoid having to actually consider nuance and individual situations.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 27 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Zero tolerance? Except for deepfake porn, apparently.

The parents should sue the school for tolerating that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (11 children)

She was 100% in the right and this is not morally ambiguous

We need to find out how to raise boys that cant even conceive of this kind of conduct

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We need to find out how to raise boys that cant even conceive of this kind of conduct

While I agree with the sentiment on the surface, naïveté doesn’t solve the root issue. We need to raise boys who violently reject people who inevitably conceive of this kind of conduct. Sociopaths and misogynists will always exist. That’s why it’s important for a healthy society to root them out as soon as they show their true colors.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

The US president is a pedophile. Victim blaming is a standard now, pedophilia and kiddy pron is protected these days. We're living in a really shitty dystopia these days.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 1 day ago

Americans seem to be too comfortable defending perverts.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope her parents took her out for pizza, ice cream and signed her up for a kickboxing class. Because I would be proud if she did that, honestly.

She asked them to stop, the school did nothing. Well, then it’s time to handle it yourself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Was he expelled though? Only physical violence is an expellable offense? Making porn of a classmate and sharing it doesn't get you expelled? What the fuck?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wow....gotta love a future where you fuck around and the victim gets to find out instead of the offender

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 33 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

There are the obvious comments about trump being a pedo and all but I think there is also another subject at play here

The US loves to apply zero tolerance policies. Thesr sound impressive, "zeeerroooo tolerance, we will do everything to stop the bad guy!" But in reality it's just virtue signalling without doing anything about the real problem.

Zero tolerance policies make it that the institution doesn't have to deal with any real problems. A student is a potential problem? Expel them, arrest them, get rid of them. This way, you don't have to deal with anything and fuck that student, who cares about them?

A 12 year girl writes on her desk that she likes a clasmate? Arrest her with handcuffs and all and throw her in jail. (True story)

A girl doesn't do her homework? Send her to something that effectively is a jail. Why spend time to support her, try to figure out what are the causes behind her problems? Just get rid of it. Eto tolerance, baby!

Somebody at school or work get bullied forever and finally snaps and hits back? Investigating WHY would take up resources, time, effort, it would cost money that can go to the shareholders and the CEO. Just fire that person, problem gone. That the bullies remain is not a problem, who cares about that? That that, over time, makes ymthe environment in your organization more and more toxic is not your problem.

I see all these US mass shootings done by young kids and young adults, and I just wonder. I know that the easy access to guns is an enormous issue that a handful of assholes don't want to fix, but these zero tolerance policies too have a lot of influence on this, I think.

The USA needs to start dealing with their problems instead of just expelling and jailing every person who has a problem

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 day ago (6 children)

If it was a realistic-looking image of a nude 13 year old, isn't it child porn?

Sounds like the school and the sheriff's office only started to investigate once the family got lawyers.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 32 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

If I was her dad, I'd be asking to take candid photo of the staff that took that decision, for no particular reasons, and see them stumble. But apparently "boys will be boys" remain strong :/

I think it's time to start actually protecting and caring for children instead of using them as a scapegoat.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 31 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Fine, let her be expelled to be free of those jackoffs, but put him in jail for creating and distributing child pornography.

Oh wait, our system is too screwed up for that.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They expelled her. That seems crazy if it is her first incident. Suspension sure.

More importantly, how did the school address the bullying? Did the person who made it see any consequences? Did she report it and did the school ignore it? All of those matter.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

I hope they win the lawsuit.

I have a feeling it was the oh-so-popular "0 tolerance" policy that she was punished and he wasn't. Because the policy didn't cover what he did. And schools these days love to avoid accountability or being adults when it matters.

load more comments
view more: next ›