this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
143 points (100.0% liked)

News

33209 readers
3267 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nice, you just buy a house when you’re 10 years old and you’re good to go

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Or, raise the retirement age to 75

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Awesome thing to do in a country where life expectancy has been falling year after year and is currently 78.4 years

Enjoy those 3.4 golden years

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How many 25 year olds are out here buying houses

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Average age for first time home buyer is 40 now, I believe.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I just assume that I’ll either die as a casualty in the worlds dumbest war, or in a workplace accident once the idiots in charge fully dismantle the federal government and my boss no longer needs to listen to osha.

Or the Fedbois come for my family.

Retirement seems kinda like a pipe dream.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The 30 year mortgage was a mistake now 50? Lol so most home buyers won't start paying down the principle of the loan until 35 years into the mortgage?! Banks are so turned on by this idea. Even more so with American having a massive economic downturn every 5 years.

[–] IamtheMorgz@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I also worry home prices will jump to eat up any monthly cost differences, too. Like okay your 50 year mortgage is $100 less a month but we increased the price of the house by $50000 so unless you're already a homeowner (and plan on renting next) then you'll be further priced out of the market.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

That's the whole point. This doesn't affect institutional purchasers because they pay cash most of the time. It ONLY hurts individuals.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Can they stop being so ridiculous that this woman has a chance to make sense? God,at the beginning of a 30 year mortgage, you are already paying mostly interest. Cut some of the principal off and now you are paying a couple hundred bucks less at most. Will they offer lower interest rates or will they jack up 30 year interest rates?

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

This is Trump we're talking about here. He will make this as self-serving as possible if it should even come to fruition. It will also be the absolute worst deal for anyone gullible enough to get on board. Think about these 10-year car loans and the like...people are taking them.

Do we even expect a modern house to still be intact in 50 years? Hell, can anyone expect to survive 50 more years the way things are going? Shit, maybe i will get in on this after all, lol

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Interest should be illegal

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The end result of this is everyone buys homes and cars in cash or they just invent something that is interest without calling it interest. They have that for certain religions who have a faith-based objection to interest. It seems dumb to me, but apparently structuring it with the interest rolled into the principal and called something else makes god happy.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

To add to this: Christianity was one of those religions and it's the major reason why there are so many Jewish bankers. Jewish families were well-established in the industry long before Christians figured out there was money to be made in banking and loosened the rules

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago

Why is that?

[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

At the current prime rate of 7%, changing a loan from 30 years to 50 would reduce payments by less than 10%. Just a terrible idea.

[–] dmention7@midwest.social 11 points 1 week ago

Shit, even at historic lows of 3% interest it only drops the monthly payment by about 25%, but increases the total cost of the loan by 80%.

Its absolutely a terrible idea.

[–] Zugyuk@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Average first time home buyer age is over 40 atm. So, banks guns go fer that?

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah its basically free money. Someone pays rent and they take the house for resale when they die or cant pay.

[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

We live in a coast-to-coast slave plantation.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

The con of extended loans is so well known. 🫠

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 17 points 1 week ago

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), led by director Bill Pulte, confirmed that United States President Donald Trump's administration is actively working on a proposal to offer home buyers mortgages with repayment terms of up to 50 years. Pulte described the plan as 'a complete game changer' in a post on X.

Shoddy McMansion wealth hoarder nepobaby says what?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Pulte

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

Why stop at 50? Let's start multi-generation mortgages. You can pass down your debt to your loves ones for them to remember you by

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 8 points 1 week ago

The law of unintended consequences says that this will just result in more douchebags buying $3 mil houses because they can "afford the payments" and plan on dying before they ever fully pay it off.