this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
549 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

76672 readers
2087 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PKscope@lemmy.world 263 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Tackling the problems that really matter. Good job, FBI.

Fucking clowns.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago

Oh matters to them all right, and their boss.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago

And it's not like they're gonna stop them anyways.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 217 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Seems like another attempt to stifle the flow of information.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 111 points 1 day ago

I'll take Things fascists do for 400 please, Alex.

[–] XiELEd@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago

I remember when ICE took down Zlibrary...

[–] Balldowern@lemmy.zip 131 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Why isn't the FBI doing anything about Epstein island list ? That's more important than some archive website.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 56 points 1 day ago

Whose bread I eat, his song I sing.

[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 day ago

Because the archive site points out their deceptions, lies and cruelty

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

Because the victims of the rape of children in the Epstein case don't have the money. The perpetrators do.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 12 points 23 hours ago

They probably are. They're trying to make sure it hasn't leaked onto archive.is.

They don't need to, they already have it all.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 110 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can just go fuck a duck. Archive is super useful. Leave it alone.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)

go fuck a duck

Poor duck....

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 100 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The FBI is probably going nuts here because someone inadvertently archived the Epstein files and everyone at HQ is panicking. They need to purge it for the Internet before someone discovers that archived content, and so they’re using CP as an excuse.

In fairness, if they are hosting those files, there is a very good chance there is cp

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 81 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)
[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AI stealing our work. The collapse of social networks. The need to pay journalists to produce impactful journalism. Here is why we are asking for your email address to read 404 Media.

https://www.404media.co/why-404-media-needs-your-email-address/

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So basically you need to spam me. Because a donation plea every so often . . .doesn't get enough addresses to sell?

I'm saying it's a flawed implementation is all.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 24 points 1 day ago

Purely anecdotal but they're the only news site that I've ever given my email to and I actually enjoy seeing their emails. They send entire (interesting) articles that can be read with no CSS/tracking images enabled and their monetisation is a small text ad that breaks a single couple of paragraphs.

I've never gotten an email from them that was begging for money or anything like that, just basically an RSS feed of interesting articles

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

Softest paywall ever - they do such good work, they can have an anonymous email of mine no problem

Magic link’s so annoying though, just wanna password (they’re journalists not techies though is the long and short of it)

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 74 points 1 day ago

Friends of tech Bros Incorporated.

Regulatory capture is complete in the states.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The archive runs Apache Hadoop and Apache Accumulo. All data is stored on HDFS, textual content is duplicated 3 times among servers in 2 datacenters and images are duplicated 2 times. Both datacenters are in Europe, with OVH hosting at least one of them.

To avoid detection, archive.today runs via a botnet that cycles through countless IP addresses, making it quite difficult for grumpy webmasters to stop their sites getting scraped. Access to paywalled sites is through logins secured via unclear means, which need to be replenished constantly: here’s the creator asking for Instagram credentials. Finally, the serving of the website is also subject to a perpetual game of cat and mouse: “I can only predict that there will be approximately one trouble with domains per year and each fifth trouble will result in domain loss.” As of today, archive.today still works, but users are redirected to archive.md.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Infamous"? More like wonderfully useful.

[–] conorab@lemmy.conorab.com 8 points 20 hours ago

It occasionally catches things that archive.org misses too. Also really nice to have an alternative.

It’d be nice to have a way of doing decentralised archiving while still keeping the trust. If you’re trying to prove that a site really said something at a certain date to another person, pointing to your own archive is kinda useless.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No for real, why? Why are they persuing this?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 14 points 23 hours ago

It's hard to rewrite the past if someone's keeping receipts

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That would explain why adguard’s public DNS started blocking it (labeled vaguely as “legal request”).

[–] mierdabird@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Guess I'll be getting around to starting my own pihole after all

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] girlthing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The owner should release the source code / configuration, in whatever state it's in, before things escalate further. It'd suck for all their work to go down the drain. I'm sure there'd be people willing to adopt the project and host instances.

If you agree and you have Tumblr, would you consider asking them anonymously?

https://blog.archive.today/ask

[–] a_person@piefed.social 24 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Damn, I was wondering why it was down. I hope it goes back up soon, its such a useful tool.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

@a_person@piefed.social @silence7@slrpnk.net @technology@lemmy.world

Same when I tried to access the archived version of the linked article of this thread. I was faced by a TLS error I never saw before (SSL_ERROR_INTERNAL_ERROR_ALERT), so I thought the Archive Today was facing server-side issues, until I decided to try accessing through the smartphone, and no error happened there.

I only managed to access Archive Today through my computer after disabling several security things, which seems quite suspicious, as if the Archive Today were being hijacked by a MitM (possibly the FBI themselves? They're famous for setting up honeypots) who were trying to push malicious code/tracking to whomever access it.

I would be further worried if I were USian or a citizen from Global North (as I'm Brazilian and from Global South, I can tell the FBI to go pound sand, lol).

To USians, my suggestion is caution accessing Archive Today (at least the current IP address being pointed at by mainstream DNS resolvers) for a while, as the server, while seemingly Archive Today, may be actually some kind of FBI honeypot in disguise. It goes without saying how ICANN and IANA are US entities, prone to interference from three-lettered US agencies. There are alternatives to Archive Today, such as Ghost Archive and 12ft.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 24 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

The news sites are trying to have it both ways. Serving the news articles to visitors and then covering them up with a paywall with browser tricks.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm a bit sympathetic to them — they do need to get paid to keep operating, and ads don't cover the cost of providing news anymore

collapsed inline media

[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I would put that more on the ad networks, if the ads were related to the article, it may generate a few more clicks. The ads are completely random and built off a profile they assume would contain relevant info about me... but it doesn't really seem to be accurate (this is kind of by my own choosing though).

Instead articles about rebuilding cars should have ads related to perhaps rebuilding cars and not some fucking nutritional supplement or some other unrelated thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I get around paywalls by disabling JavaScript when I read the news

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I use the mozilla reader mode

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Bypass Paywalls Clean is still around.

Bypass Paywalls Clean for Firefox

Extension: https://gitflic.ru/project/magnolia1234/bypass-paywalls-firefox-clean

Support only: https://github.com/bpc-clone/bpc_firefox_support/issues

Bypass Paywalls Clean for Chrome

Extension: https://gitflic.ru/project/magnolia1234/bypass-paywalls-chrome-clean

Support only: https://github.com/bpc-clone/bpc_chrome_support/issues

Updating

For Firefox at least, if you pin the extension to the browser toolbar (or whatever the space next to the address bar is called) you will see a little yellow triangle badge whenever there is an update. Click the extension icon to update.

For Firefox mobile and forks, you may get a notification that there is an update but I haven't found a one click solution so I just go to the repo, download the xpi and install. To install from file on mobile you need to go to Settings > About Firefox > Tap the logo several times until you see Debug enabled > Go back to main Settings > Under Advanced look for Install extension from file.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Question: how does this site differ in function to the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 28 points 1 day ago

They dont let sites opt-out, and they do a much more seamless job of enabling people to archive paywalled content

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago

You can access pages that are still actively behind any given site's paywall.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When are we going to start talking about abolishing the FBI?

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The last president to talk about that got a magic bullet for his troubles.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If it's someone operating from Russia, they can beat it and get lost, because it won't disappear.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

It's more than famous, it's infamous!

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

let’s hope the canadian company just ignores this

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›