this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
530 points (98.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

27215 readers
1286 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 122 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Depending on the exact level of stupidity clinging to the judge on that day, some jurisdictions might consider this “hacking.”

One case from the states that was luckily dismissed: https://uk.pcmag.com/security/136282/missouri-gov-goes-after-reporter-who-found-shockingly-bad-flaw-in-state-website https://www.vice.com/en/article/this-is-the-hacking-investigation-into-journalist-who-clicked-view-source-on-government-website/

[–] chazwhiz@lemmy.world 93 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Isn’t that just effectively un-minified? It’s just the client side code in the first place?

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 78 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Comments and full-length names make the source way more accessible.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Yeah but even then they should be writing secure code anyways so it doesn't matter if someone reads it. It's just ui code. It's always readable

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 9 points 9 hours ago

Huh, I hate doing front end but I feel like in this team I'd manage. Shit even has comments.

[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

This is why you self host a private Gitea instance and have it auto mirror all of your github repos.

I forked it, and my instance automatically grabbed me a forever copy.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 77 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Copyrighted content

archived them

on GitHub

Idk man 🧐
Run the countdown to when it's taken down

[–] refalo@programming.dev 19 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

There's lots of content sitting just below the surface on github. Any time you make a PR on a repo, even if it gets closed or "deleted" by the repo owner, the actual link to the file itself stays there forever if you save it. Github's own dmca repo even has warez links on it, sitting there for years.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Oh that's cool, I had no idea! Though does that apply to content removed for DMCAs?

[–] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 7 hours ago

Usually entire repos are disabled in that case. I've never tried to access hidden content on a DMCA-removed repo, but I assume it would not work.

[–] nihilomaster@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

You could argue that since it's publicly available and this repo only archives it that... I don't know man Copyright law is confusing.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

I think you can get some kind of exemption for archival purposes. I know that the Internet Archive has one. But I also know that ultimately Microsoft is responsible for the data hosted on Github, and Microsoft's interest is to not even risk getting sued.

[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yep, it’s got a DMCA takedown now

[–] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 68 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Security through obscurity is not security. I see no reason why source maps should be unavailable.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 57 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Because source maps show how shitty your organization's code and overall engineering practices are.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 35 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Ding ding ding

Open source code is usually quite nice and well done because money pressure is way less of an issue and everyone knows people will be looking at your code

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 7 points 5 hours ago

If you look at the casual code that I have shamelessly made public on my GitLab, that might change your mind on that.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That's probably also why development is usually really slow and most maintainers can't keep up/give up.

Nope, it is simply because they are overwhelmed. Either it's too much work to do after your day job or just too much work for one person.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 day ago (3 children)

SVELTE 🥹 (im very happy to see svelte)

Also I'm scared that this person may be risking their github account by posting this, I dunno if it's legal to "distribute" apples website code yourself. If not, best hope they dont ban your whole account.

[–] mudkip@lemdro.id 13 points 23 hours ago

we love svelte

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 9 points 20 hours ago

Or even sue them

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 8 points 7 hours ago

I mean... They kinda distributed it themselves /s

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 40 points 20 hours ago

And now the source code is part of copilot

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You’re supposed to disable source maps in prod?

Asking for a friend

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 18 hours ago

if you think your source code is that precious and unique and special, go ahead and worry about it haha

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just to save on wasted bandwidth for the client (and your server) is why I would disable them.

[–] brian@programming.dev 37 points 23 hours ago

they're different files generally, the only client that will automatically request them is a debugger.

you turn them off because you don't want to expose your full source code. if you would be ok making your webpage git repo public then making sourcemaps available is fine.

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 6 points 5 hours ago

I work for a large software corp and we generally keep them in prod because it makes debugging prod issues much easier. The browser only downloads them when the dev tools are open.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yo gimme a repo link, you can’t blueball us like that

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is this interesting for some reason?

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s how the web worked before minifiers, so kinda but not really.

You just have comments and original variable/function names.

I’m sure someone will argue this helps scrapers or hackers, but really it’s not that big of a deal.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

It help users that make websites styles!

Eg. I have a discord style for fixing their bullshit

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 2 points 4 hours ago

Anyone capable of doing damage already knows how to format and read minified code anyway. I do it in prod all the time when I want to test something with an override, which causes the source map to become invalid.

[–] mmmac@lemmy.zip 19 points 13 hours ago

Our international teams kept enabling sourcemaps and I just had devops lock the directory to vpn access only 🤷

I know sourcemaps aren't the end of the world as it's all client side code that lives on the clients computer but it just feels dirty

[–] silt_haddock@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

I’m gonna download this to my iPhone, just in case.

Try and stop me, Tim Apple!

[–] oopsallnaps@piefed.ca 8 points 23 hours ago

iirc Apple music's web ui also has sourcemaps, but I'm not subbed to apple music anymore to check. Its neat, but not really a huge blunder, nor takedown worthy.