this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
720 points (99.5% liked)

People Twitter

8468 readers
1973 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 78 points 2 days ago (3 children)

A car does not randomly have a DUI device...

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Especially in Wisconsin. Our drunk driving laws are some of the most lax in the nation. There's a saying that the first DUI is free, and it's only kinda a joke.

[–] YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pop over to Michigan and they permanently revoke your license for a second DUI.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

can't have shit in detroit

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When you look at consumption rates it makes sense. Wisconsin is a powerhouse of drinking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iamacar@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

I’ll tell the IRS to screw off. I’ll hit a lawyers car for fun. I will not fuck with the tavern league of Wisconsin.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Takes a whole lot of DUIs in Wisconsin. Probably years and years of consistently driving home drunk

Driving drunk is just an expected part of American life in most of the country. If it weren't, we'd have ways to get around other than by car

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Or maybe she's one of those dimwits who likes to annoy judges by asking them if they are following maritime or common law, and assert that the court doesn't have jurisdiction over them, and that they're not travelling, and that nobody was personally harmed...

It's impressive just how careful judges tend to be with these nutcases, which I suppose is because it's so far outside the rules of court, that they tend to play too safe and end up vindicating the whole clown show...

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Seriously, this isn't that sweet of a scene

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 33 points 2 days ago

It never pretended to be a sweet scene. It's basically just saying that wisconsinites are alcoholics.

[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why not? Not a single person drove drunk that day

[–] Laser@feddit.org 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At least not the car that has a DUI device installed. But considering the car is the primary method to get around in the States, some of the people in that story probably drove a car before and after

[–] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Is "waiting a few hours until you're better" not a thing in the US?

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"You don't have to go home but you can't stay here!"

Sitting in a car while drunk is a DUI in many if not most states.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Holding car keys near your car can be too, if the cop wants to arrest you.

[–] scoobford@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Not really. You can get a DUI for sleeping in the backseat of a car and you can get charged with vagrancy or public intox for sleeping it off in public. You have to go home (or to someone else's home), and the car is probably the only way to get there.

That's why designated drivers and taxis/ubers are so important. The only alternatives are dangerous or illegal unless you can find and afford a spontaneous hotel or you live in a big enough city to have useful public transit.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It seems to me that there's some weird propaganda going on in this thread. I've only ever known one person who has driven while drunk and the only reason I know that is that he confessed it out of deep shame.

I guess it's possible that everyone I know is out joyriding every time they drink and just not telling me, but assuming that's not true, I - being from and in the US - never really experienced a culture remotely supportive of drunk driving.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That's because they didn't include the part where she lands flat on her ass laughing when she realizes "this isn't even MY CAR you guys!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

Communities are stronger when they come together. Truly a inspiration to us all.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 28 points 2 days ago

It would have been fine. The tow truck also has a DUI lockout.

[–] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry who can translate this to a European?

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 67 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The woman's car wouldn't start because of an installed device that makes her pass a breathalyzer (something courts can mandate). Midwestern people are stereotypically very helpful, but the ones from Wisconsin drink a lot, so nobody present could pass the breathalyzer either. The solution was for all the drunk strangers to physically push her car to where it needed to be.

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

that's why you have sober balloons in the trunk

[–] MycelialMass@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Holy crap lol i hope people dont do that

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I had a friend in high school who's father was an alcoholic attorney, and he'd have his kids pass the breathalyzer for him every morning.

I actually bought a user 2001 S10 off them in 2004 with like 25k miles on it for only 3 grand because he'd keep rubbing along the side of in the driveway pulling in and out drunk, so it had a bunch of cosmetic damage that I didn't care about at all.

I drove that truck for 11 years.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s the best kind of S-10

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

It was so scraped up people probably assumed it was a Dakota.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

He must've gotten lucky. The ones I've seen require you to blow every 10 minutes while driving. Dad would not have gotten all the way to work these days.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're joking. Interkocks are more sophisticated than that. You're not going to fool one with a balloon. You have to inhale before exhaling, and a camera records a video of you blowing to make sure there's no funny business.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I've not seen one with a camera before but it would take multiple very large balloons, and a level of coordination that a drunk would not have.

You have to breathe out for a full 30s strong or it will error. It was suprisingly difficult. Then every 10 minutes while driving - it will beep and you have 2 minutes to blow into it or it flips out, and the car shuts off. You won't be able to turn it back on without contacting someone.

Source: My buddy's dad was an alcoholic. He'd have to go home early from playing so he could do the breathalyzer and ride along so his dad could take the car out anywhere. Sometimes he'd have to skip school to go to his dad's work.

Actually it's fucked up thinking about it now....

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Just checked, and I can only last thirty seconds at a rather feeble rate. Apparently the device is for people who trained their lung capacity in the childhood.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Thanks mate!

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

surprised they didn't still get a DUI for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated

y'know, what with cops giving them out to people sleeping it off in the back of their car and whatnot. somebody had to get in the car to put it in neutral

Cops don't catch most people.

[–] psivchaz@reddthat.com 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The DUI device will let you shift into neutral? I thought usually you had to turn the key to get it into neutral.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It would be a safety hazard if it prevented you from shifting into neutral, for situations like this. Tow truck would have needed to put it in neutral as well

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Tow trucks dont have to. If they cant tow it on a free axle, they'll just use dollys.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Sometimes but many cars also have a shift lock override that allows you to drop it in neutral, usually a small slot near the shifter knob the key will fit into. Dollys are only good for short distance and sometimes you need to get it on a bed.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 19 points 2 days ago

Depends on the car and device, but I think they usually disable the ignition, not the key turning.

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Don't most cars also have the little hidden keyhole next to the shifter, specifically for this purpose?

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No not specifically for a bunch of alcoholics to move a car under human power.

But yes most cars do have that.

Okay, maybe not that specifically, but more generally, to move the car when it cannot, for whatever reason, move itself.

Even if that reason is alchohilism.

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

I mean it is pretty damn unlikely these days but it could be a stick

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If you have to have a breathalyzer device installed, you shouldn’t be allowed to drive

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago

Its crazy that a car is viewed as so integral to a persons ability to make a living that we have to allow these types of situations to happen.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

That's the Midwest I miss

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Big 'ope energy.

load more comments
view more: next ›