this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35485 readers
4088 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, if you aren't counting your calories and eating in a deficit, you're not going to lose weight.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Research shows that small amounts of physical fitness during the day can be just as beneficial as a full workout

A 2019 review of 19 studies looked at this question, involving more than 1,000 participants. It found multiple, shorter “chunks” of exercise in a day improved heart and lung fitness and blood pressure as much as doing one longer session.

And there was some evidence these chunks actually led to more weight loss and lower cholesterol.

https://studyfinds.org/can-you-microdose-exercise/

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

has nothing to do with eating a deficit in calories. you can workout all day everyday, but if you eat garbage mcdonalds and packaged food, you are not going to lose weight 'micro working out' or even full day workouts.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

You are not making sense. If I'm a football player and use 3000 calories a day working out, I will lose weight. When you're counting calories, do you put the exercise factor in?

Yes, calories matter, but working out is usually part of it. This is because it burns calories at the time, but continues to speed up your metabolism.

Our bodies are meant to move, plus counting calories is a defeating process. I'm not saying eat crap, but try to eat healthier and move your ass.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The quality of food has little impact on weight loss. It's calories in calories out. Period.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 1 points 3 weeks ago

Dunning Kruger.

Your body is so much more complicated than a function that takes calories as input and outputs an expected result. You need more than just calories, you need nutrients. A nutrient deficient person does not burn calories the same way a person with a balanced diet does.

Like just think for a second. Is the only variable of food that matters is calories, then why do you need vitamins? Why do we split calories into categories like protein, carbs, veggies, fruits, etc? Why can you get a PhD in nutrition if it's only as simple as calories in calories out?

The simple answer is it's not simple. Asserting that it is when it isn't creates some terrible narratives around exercise, diet, and body image.

[–] FinnFooted@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Eh. Calories are... Tricky. What is a calorie? A unit of food which, when burned, will heat a gram of water by 1 degree Celsius. But your body isnt just a furnace, it's complex. And everyone is physiologically different - we aren't all running at the same efficiency (base metabolism). And not all calories are available. For example, fiber is not digestable and can't be absorbed by the digestive system and it also associates with simple sugars which also prevents them from being properly absorbed. So, eating whole fruits will result in absorbing less sugar than drinking juice which has the same total amount of sugar. Processing food - even just cooking it - makes calories more bioavailable.

For sure it can conceptually be boiled down to calories effectively absorbed and calories burned. But digging into what that actually means can actually be quite tricky.

[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, exactly, calories in vs calories out is just another myth that feeds the diet industry's bottom line. It's not accurate. Like bmi used to be the big thing, but that's not an accurate measurement system at all.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is untrue. Calories in vs calories out continues to be, and will always be the center point of weight loss. It's just complicated by other factors like genetics, finding each individual calorie needs, and following diet and lifestyle patterns that are effective and sustainable.

[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

See but I think we're both actually saying the same thing. The amount of factors that go into calories in vs calories out, essentially makes it unusable. Just looking at calories as a base whole product, not the individual piece of food and the nutrients it provides, is mad. By that rationale you could just live on oranges. They're calories, or junk food. Calories.

It's not calculable, how one individual body absorbs, processes, and then manufactures the essential nutrients it needs, from "calories". It's essentially saying how much food in vs how much food burning out. But that's not how fat is turned from fat to energy consumption, by the human body. It has nothing about the essential needs of the body.

It's a myth perpetuated by diet industry that only keeps you on the hamster wheel of weight loss and, for most people not genetically gifted, never really works. Or only works short term but then your body goes into survival mode, and stacks it all, and more, back on.

Here's a an article that might help say things better than I am. https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2023/07/05/its-time-to-bust-the-calories-in-calories-out-weight-loss-myth.html